Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This is getting to the point where it is absurd. Dorsett is a solid contributor as many have pointed out in the role that he has. While at the same time the Colts media is slowly realizing the very same limitations of JB that made the Patriots move on from him:
The trade was anything but a bust for us. You know what trade was a bust ? Coleman + 1 for Marsh.. that is a bust. JB for Dorsett gave us a solid player and emergency depth for Cooks on a rookie contract. You are just looking at the bottomline without any context.
Brissett is only a "starting QB" because their starting QB got hurt. Brissett is not a *real* starting QB.
I don't think there's a jihad against Brissett, not really. I see a lot of fans rallying to the defense of Belichick. They seem to be seeing the Brissett trade and its analysis after the fact as an attack on our head coach.I really don't understand the jihad here dumping on inexperienced Brissett who...
1. had ZERO training camp with the Clots
2. started his 1st several games having no knowledge of the offense
3. joined a team whose GM was busy trimming its roster to TANK the season
4. joined a bad team with a proven atrocious OL
5. despite all the above, ranks just below the middle of the pack of NFL QB performance
It's guys like BB who emphasize how important training camp is especially for inexperienced players
I'm still sticking to my prediction that JB will turn out to be a better QB than Prescott which means he is a real starting QB imo.
If anything, that's an indictment on how bad the rest of the league is.I really don't understand the jihad here dumping on inexperienced Brissett who...
1. had ZERO training camp with the Clots
2. started his 1st several games having no knowledge of the offense
3. joined a team whose GM was busy trimming its roster to TANK the season
4. joined a bad team with a proven atrocious OL
5. despite all the above, ranks just below the middle of the pack of NFL QB performance
It's guys like BB who emphasize how important training camp is especially for inexperienced players
You make a lot of excuses. Doesn’t change the outcome however, the Colts still won that trade. A starting QB for a depth WR is a bad trade. You could ask a 6 year old who just watched his first nfl game and he would grasp that.
You are all over the place. So we would have kept Edelman involved, we are able to involve Bennett, but Dorsett is the exception. Your excuses are weak. I mention Hogan because there are 7-8 targets a game that would have went to him over the past 3 weeks that still aren’t going to Dorsett. A solid contributor as you call him would have stepped up and filled a Hogan’s void, Dorsett has not.
Or an indictment of us. We really are in no position to be a good judge of average quarterbacks. We've been spoiled for way too long to really understand what most teams have to deal with at the QB position.If anything, that's an indictment on how bad the rest of the league is.
Personally I still think that trade was a win-win, because Dorsett is more useful to the Patriots right now than Brissett would have been at the moment.
Jacoby is paying a heavy price to become a starting QB in the NFL, holy crap.
Consistently contributes on the field? He has not had a catch in 7 of 11 games this season.You make no sense at all. We didnt trade Brady. We traded our #3 QB to the Colts for a player that consistently contributes on the field. Whether this is in the blocking game, by funneling coverage somewhere or with receptions he actually made an impact. JB would have been inactive through the first 8 games and then sat on the bench (or maybe would have been cut/IRd to make room for a real backup like Hoyer).
Yes because we could have never found a player to run a route and not have the ball throw to him, Dorsett was the only one that could do it.And just to make the point even more clear why Hogans injury made Dorsetts presence relevant:
Jacoby is paying a heavy price to become a starting QB in the NFL, holy crap.
I'm sure that being number 4 on the depth chart when they're almost never throwing 4 WRs on the field at once had nothing whatsoever to do with it.Consistently contributes on the field? He has not had a catch in 7 of 11 games this season.
A real backup like Brian Hoyer... wow you sound so dumb it's laughable.
Yes because we could have never found a player to run a route and not have the ball throw to him, Dorsett was the only one that could do it.
If Dorsett was good he would be on the field and be getting the opportunity. The fact that he cannot get on the field on a team that lost it's #1 WR in the preseason indicates he is not doing a whole lot to increase his opportunities.I'm sure that being number 4 on the depth chart when they're almost never throwing 4 WRs on the field at once had nothing whatsoever to do with it.
Against NO, when Amendola was out, he was targeted 3 times and caught all three. Since Hogan has been out he's been targeted 3 times and caught all 3. For the season, he's caught the ball every single time its been thrown his way. He's also averaging 20 yards a catch.
Compare Brissett to Wentz and Goff in their first season as a starter...Yeah, no. He hasn't played well. His play has been, at best, the very definition of mediocre.
??? DLew already proved he could be a feature back in this program a long time ago.Dion Lewis was last on the depth chart for RBs at the start of the season, he earned his way onto the field more.
Mitchell did a lot of his damage as a regular season receiver either before we learned what we had with Chris Hogan, or after the injury to Gronk opened things up for the wide receivers.If Dorsett was good he would be on the field and be getting the opportunity. The fact that he cannot get on the field on a team that lost it's #1 WR in the preseason indicates he is not doing a whole lot to increase his opportunities.
Dion Lewis was last on the depth chart for RBs at the start of the season, he earned his way onto the field more.
Malcolm Mitchell had 32 catches 14 games as our #4 or #5 WR last season.
| 38 | 7K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











