- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,355
- Reaction score
- 105,353
See other postBy the way please exaplin this dramatic roster erosion from 2016 to 2017 that meant gase couldn’t possibly win.
I don’t see the big defections you are saying happened.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.See other postBy the way please exaplin this dramatic roster erosion from 2016 to 2017 that meant gase couldn’t possibly win.
I don’t see the big defections you are saying happened.
He didn't use Bolden enough eitherMy main issue was his knack to shove Frank gore down our throats instead of drake. Heck it took a gore injury for them to finally start using ballage as well.
Wait you said tannehill was the problem.2017- Cutler was QB. Ajayi sulked b/c of his contract.
2018-Landry gone. Parker sucks. D sucked. Whe DA is your leading receiver you have talent issues
So there was no roster degradation after all.See other post
I like Gase's philosophy (taking best of breed from different offensive systems, QB friendly, not an egomaniac like Martz) but they need a EP guy.
The schedule is the schedule. Using that as a part of your argument for why Gase sucked felt like you were grasping straws.And we won 14 games and the Sb.
They snuck in to the playoffs and were 1 and done.
We also beat the Texans and Steelers twice and the falcons in the Sb.
But yeah, same thing
It was putting his one and done wild card achievement in perspective.The schedule is the schedule. Using that as a part of your argument for why Gase sucked felt like you were grasping straws.
But go on
I said Tannenbaum.Wait you said tannehill was the problem.
Gase personally picked cutler after coaching him in 2015.
You realize that ajayi, Landry and Parker all had issues with gase right?
Defense sucked is a coaching issue.
Parker sucked is a coaching issue.
DA being your leading receiver is a coaching issue.
Why put your soon-to-be 42 year old Qb through that? It makes zero sense. Its not that simple.They don't necessarily need an EP guy imo. Just a good offensive scheme guy. Brady can translate whatever into EP.
How can a ****ty FO be irrelevant to the HCs success?
Tannenbaum came in with a bunch of cap space, signed Suh , gave Tanny that crap contract, filled the cap, hired Gase and when the bills came due he drafted ****ty and traded players. He's awful.
Gase may well be a crap coach but to not acknowledge Tannenbaum s incompetence and hand in MIA failures is an incomplete analysis
You cited tannehill as tannenbaums screw up now you cite him being hurt as the problem.I said Tannenbaum.
He was a 4th round pick and the primary reason gase saw a playoff game. It was a good pick. Gase and ajayi had issues too.Read more about Ajayi. He had maturity issues at Boise St.
And also was pissed at how gase misused himLandry wanted money.
Good coaches could have won a lot more with that talent.Need talent too, Andy and MIA has zip. Can make chix salad with chix ****
The guy he couldn’t win with?Didn't Gase lose his starting QB for many of the regular season games and the one playoff game that he coached? That should be taken into consideration.
Why put your soon-to-be 42 year old Qb through that? It makes zero sense. Its not that simple.
The guy he couldn’t win with?
You cited tannehill as tannenbaums screw up now you cite him being hurt as the problem..
...and then he got hurt and started ditching practices.He was a 4th round pick and the primary reason gase saw a playoff game. It was a good pick. Gase and ajayi had issues too..
And also was pissed at how gase misused him.
Good coaches could have won a lot more with that talent.
“Didn’t have talent to work with” is a lazy excuse for a loser.
Per sources, the Lions and OC Jim Bob Cooter have mutually agreed to part ways. Other teams have shown interest in Cooter the last few days.
All about situations. And what each coach is dealt with. His performance in Miami is damn similar to how Bill performed in Cleveland, by the way (save a playoff win).It was putting his one and done wild card achievement in perspective.
If you want to think that followed by 6-10 and 7-9 is a good job, feel free.
Through what? I would prioritize having a guy that could creatively attack various defenses over a dud who new the EP lingo. I can imagine discussing play design in the film room doesn't necessarily require speaking in tongue.
I could be wrong I guess but I don't think not knowing the EP lingo eliminates a good OC from contention.
Gase supported giving tannehill the contractCrappy contract hurt cap space. Cutler knew the system. There was no one else that could get up to speed so close to the start of the season.
You are saying Gase is blameless because players left, but those players left because of issues with him....and then he got hurt and started ditching practices.
So what if they had issues? Can't the player check his ego at the door and conform to the program?
He was misused.He wanted his route tree expanded because he wanted to get his $$ up. Bla bla bla.
Both of you would be wrong.Gase can't say that but I can.
Really not even comparable.All about situations. And what each coach is dealt with. His performance in Miami is damn similar to how Bill performed in Cleveland, by the way (save a playoff win).
I would at exactly the same thing about McDaniels if he has gase’s resume.Your judgment over a young 40 year old coach having a couple of sub .500 level seasons is overboard just to fit a stubborn narrative as usual. You wouldn’t say the same things about McDaniels, and he flamed out much worse than Gase did.
They took a chance in gase and learned he isn’t a good Hc. Now they will take a shot in someone else. That’s how it works.Do I think he’s some great coach? Not really. But who are they going to replace him with? I don’t see many options out there that would be much better than Gase at this point.