- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 33,218
- Reaction score
- 44,411
I'm reminded of that Mel Brooks movie where he keeps saying "it's great to be the king".
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm reminded of that Mel Brooks movie where he keeps saying "it's great to be the king".
Just one example of why they’ll never get Goodell out.Nah, Kraft shouldn't get involved. Let them go at it. the other owners screwed Kraft and the patriots, let them see the other way of doing business.
That was always a joke wasn't it? I think it was all about winning the lawsuit (or even getting it to ultimate adjudication) being the dicey part.
Kraft didn't go nuclear, Jones might. IDFC how it proceeds as long as it ends in Goodell being sent packing. His contract is up in a year. To re-up Goodell will be a travesty. If it takes entitled nitwit Jones to be the catalyst tonot re-up it? I can live with that...
That was always a joke wasn't it? I think it was all about winning the lawsuit (or even getting it to ultimate adjudication) being the dicey part.
Kraft didn't go nuclear, Jones might. IDFC how it proceeds as long as it ends in Goodell being sent packing. His contract is up in a year. To re-up Goodell will be a travesty. If it takes entitled nitwit Jones to be the catalyst tonot re-up it? I can live with that...
And now Jerruh's lawyers are fully engaged (warning: BSPN link: Jones' lawyer: Owners misled in Goodell talks ).
A not at all subtle run at the Commish. Wish Krafty Bob had these kinds of cajones.
It's all rich man power plays. The only real way to get past this **** is to have independent arbiters approved by both players and the league deal with discipline. It's really stupid of the NFL to get itself involved in dealing with issues such as domestic violence. Yet we got a bunch of rich guys who think they're gods, and the last thing in the world they want to do is give up power.
This will all end in tears.
Management's abuse of power in the NFL has modified my previously negative (I was once a member) view of modern labor unions.
Interesting read.To be fair (and I am 100% on the side of labor; I'm a union vice president myself), it's useless DeMaurice Smith's fault for signing a CBA that allowed management to act as judge, jury, and executioner. The players don't have a ton of leverage but they couldn't have been more idiotic in the last CBA negotiations, and that all starts with Smith.
This is a good read with your coffee: Who Ruined the NFL Players Union?
I never claimed that the incident did/didn’t take place. I pretty much said exactly what you did. The prosecutor examined the evidence and did not feel as though there was a case. A lot of that was due to lack of proof, conflicting stories and timelines, and the belief that the accused may have been lying/embellishing her story.
Also, you keep ignoring the fact that the NFL has its own investigations team who came to the conclusion that a punishment was not warranted. To me, that’s even more important. It’s why the system is in place to begin with. For Goodell to completely ignore that is even more proof that he makes it up as he sees fit.
And there’s plenty of conflicting testimony and reports, too, not to mention the timeline problems. Anyone can pick and choose items to bolster their case. I can do the same with Brady and the ball deflation scheme, but in the end it doesn’t mean a thing.This is from the prosecutor:
“Tiffany just said that she wanted him to get counseling. Not vindictive, didn’t seem like she had a vendetta. I feel like something definitely happened here. She had bruising. We couldn’t determine exactly when and how she got the bruises, so we couldn’t charge him. But that doesn’t mean something didn’t happen here.”
On Elliot's phone and texts:
The NFL requested that Elliott provide his texts and call logs with Thompson over a certain period, but he provided “redacted, incomplete” records: “None of the records provided contained the substance of any text messages, nor the call logs from from Mr. Elliott’s two cell phones and to date, such evidence has not been provided.”
From the doctors:
To be fair (and I am 100% on the side of labor; I'm a union vice president myself), it's useless DeMaurice Smith's fault for signing a CBA that allowed management to act as judge, jury, and executioner. The players don't have a ton of leverage but they couldn't have been more idiotic in the last CBA negotiations, and that all starts with Smith.
Article 46 has been there since approximately 1960 and didn't cause trouble until Goodell came along. Why blame Smith for a failure to modify Article 46? Sure, it's a nasty provision of the CBA, but it hadn't caused problems for decades so why cash in chips trying to change it? I bet if it even came up the players would have told him to not give up anything to get changes.