No he didn't. He literally announced on National TV that he will not appeal the ruling and will end the rhetoric.
How can you possibly say he appealed it?
The media kind of did that for him after a little while. Besides, the punishment was ultimately not based on evidence, so refuting the evidence only gets you so far.
The punsihment was based upon the evidence in and conclusion of the Wells report.
The media? Are you joking? When did they present this as an appeal to the punishement?
Kraft is a member of the NFL owners' club first and foremost. Remember, the owners club CAN take Kraft's franchise away. I don't think the clause has ever been enforced but it's still in the contract. If the league is feeling vindictive, cozying up to it is possibly a better option than doing his best Sylvester Stallone impersonation.
They cannot take his franchise away on a whim. He must commit egregious acts, and they still would mot be able to take it. This is America.
They cant take it away because they don't like that he defends himself against unreasonable penalties. Never could come close to happening.
What would the testimony of the owner of the New England Patriots have contributed to a trial that was based not on evidence but on Roger Goodell's power to impose punishments capriciously? Showing up might have sent a supportive message, but at the end of the day, if Kraft was in the room for every second of every trial, I don't see any actual effect happening as a result of that
You will have to ask Brady's lawyers to explain that since they asked him, so obviously they felt it would help.
See my response to 3. Besides, Goodell is not the problem.
Of course Goodell is the problem.
You are now saying if he doesn't hug Goodell they will take the team away? Jesus.
Come after them with what? How? Again, you're telling Robert Kraft to use an empty threat. There's nothing to "come after them" with. This is the most circular reasoning I've ever seen and seems to be based almost entirely on an emotional need to see the owner lash out at the bad people that hurt your baby, rather than any understanding of Kraft's actual options.
Of course there is. Kraft has power among the owners. Explaining to them that he is being wronged for nothing and expects their support or they will not get his when he needs it, is meaningful. Explaining that when the shoe is on the other foot he will respond in kind is meaningful. Explaining to Goodell that he will do everything in his power to take his job away is meaningful.
"Come on Jerry I took it" and "Roger is doing a great job" is also meaningful in the opposite direction.
Kraft has authority over what reports the league does and does not accept and correct now?
Krafts franchise asked for the exact measurements and were told to F off. Months later when they got them they were told they cannot make them public. Yes, if Kraft tried, he would have gotten those results, and made them public immediately.
The reported numbers were LIES FROM THE NFL.
All of that came out in the trial anyway.
No it came out buried in the Wells report, so no one would notice the 11 of 12 were 2 lbs under was a propaganda driven lie.
Assuming that Kraft understood the science himself, this is still something he'd have to get the 31 to agree to, and if the 31 was well disposed to Kraft at that moment, I doubt Deflategate would have happened in the first place.
Deflategate happened because of Grigson, Kensil and Goodell. It was allowed to grow into a debacle because of Kraft distancing himself from it and trusting Goodell. The 31 only became involved when it was obvious we were screwed and kraft did nothing to get them on his side. Why in the world would they allow him to be screwed if they were shown that it was bogus. This paranoid comlex that owners are jealous is bs.
The owners believed Goodells bought and paid for 'investigation' over the guy who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. So would you, until Kraft proved it was BS.
Besides, do you realize how bad it would look if the owner of the New England Patriots directly interfered in an investigation of the New England Patriots? Imagine if Jerry Jones insisted in trying to directly oversee the Ezekiel Elliott investigation. Wouldn't look good, would it?
Interfere? Who said that. He needed to monitor it, and not be surprised by the results and penalties. He absolutely needed to demand, publicly if necessary, that the real measurements be released.
Trying to muddy the waters on the Wells Report would make it look like the franchise look like it had something to hide. I know it might have been emotionally satisfying for you, but just to submit this for your consideration, going out of the way to make the situation worse for your own franchise is NOT an effective option.
I have no clue what you are talking about. He had a right to be kept informed about the investigation into his franchise. He had every right to counter any findings.
They did nothing.
This is something Kraft's allies should have been doing, if he had any. He can't do this himself without making it look like he's trying to cover something up. Even if he had direct oversight over this area of the Commissioner's Office at the time, Kraft would have been expected to recuse himself, not muddy the waters for all he's worth.
Again, no clue what you mean here. He is allowed to monitor what is going on. In fact, he was negligent to not.
This is basically #2. You are now officially repeating yourself
ITs not at all #2. Its taking a football out at Gilette stadium during a cold weather game and taking measurements through out the game ot show the drop in PSI. Its a FU to the BS science that Goodell bought, and would absolutely alter the narrative.
Remember, part of what Kraft should have stepped up to the plate to address was that his team was convicted of being cheaters and his QB was convicted of creating a scheme to cheat, and lying under oath about it.
Where is the outrage?
Pretty sure Brady's team had lawyers doing that. Why was Kraft required? And again, questioning the evidence only gets you so far when the league is nakedly admitting that the punishment is not based on evidence.
The punishment was solely based upon evidence. The fact that the evidence sucked is exactly why he needed to appeal. Bradys appeal came long after Kraft caved.
Most of your arguments center around lashing out at and embarrassing Goodell and exposing what he was doing.
No, they are ACTIONS that Kraft choose not to take that could have impacted the narrative, the results, and the reputation and legacy of his team and QB.
You are ignoring the fact that the man has no shame. This would not have been effective in any way to prevent Deflategate.
Because you say? Kraft could have done a lot and there is a lot of potential that it could have helped. You cant argue there was nothing he could have done and then 'prove it' by saying your opinion is all the many things he could have done just wouldnt have worked.
.
A strategy of accepting Deflategate and moving on to rebuild the franchise afterward and repair relationships in the owner's room is far more likely to be effective than anything you mentioned, and a lot of what you mentioned was actually done, just not necessarily by Kraft.
100% totally disagree. He gained absolutely nothing by bending over and taking it.
Nothing that I mentioned was done. The few things that happened at some other point, happened long after there would have been any impact.
You have your head buried in the sand. Kraft handled this horribly and all you have is nothing would have worked, and there is some unknown advantage he gained to doing nothing, because you are desperately trying to believe he isn't a ****y. Sorry facts dont support you.