Love The Drake
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 28,325
- Reaction score
- 26,946
BeforeJust to be solidly in the middle of the road, did BB say JG was "tough like a linebacker" before or after the injury?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.BeforeJust to be solidly in the middle of the road, did BB say JG was "tough like a linebacker" before or after the injury?
With the exception of one year of Troy Brown, agreed."Loyalty" means nothing to BB.
No one. Too painful to watch.Let's say BB cuts Brady to make JG the starting QB. Brady then signs with the Jets.
When the Jets play the Patriots, who do you root for: Brady and the Jets, or JG and the Pats?
Willie Mac leaving was difficult that's why I hope when the time comes if it's after this season even Brady retires instead of putting on another Jersey.With the exception of one year of Troy Brown, agreed.
But right. And "loyalty" is even more nonsensical regarding fans. We have no say on anything. I suppose it means we should be prepared to cry or boycott the team or something if Brady leaves? Is this a forum of 8 year old boys?
Why would it change at 43?I think saying Brady playing to 43 is pretty fair. I could see Brady lasting three more seasons MAX and needing to pick his family over football.
No I expressed an opinion that a big piece of tat discussion is whether JAG will even accept stating as a backup. Despite your attempt to control that us a valid part of that discussionYes you contaminated the other thread because that thread was about the possibility (which exists, despite your protestations to the contrary) that BB will try to keep both JG and TB, and to examine what it would mean financially and roster-wise. You seemed to think it was yet another forum for you to express your well-known view that JG will not be around. We get it Andy. We get it.
It's absurd because it's based on the naive thought that the only reason to keep him is to dump Brady.As for this topic, I am on record as saying that I think they should have traded JG this offseason because I think Brady has a few more outstanding seasons left, and I think that gives them time (and ammo) to solve the "Brady succession" problem.
But because JG was NOT traded, it seems like there's the possibility that BB sees it differently, and that it's worth exploring what kind of reasoning he might have. And I laid out what some aspects of that thinking might be.
As always, none of us has ANY idea what BB is thinking, or what will actually transpire. Given that JG is still here and that BB apparently turned down at least a first round pick for JG, it seems absurd for you to insist that it's silly to think that either Brady might be gone after 2017 (or 2018) or that BB might be looking to find a way to keep both for a few years until Brady retires and JG can take over.
We are talking about fan loyalty."Loyalty" means nothing to BB regardless of whether it's Cleveland or New England. BB's intent will alway be to make the team better and is not influenced by the fans, media, or NFL. I am enjoying the ride.
Have you read the board?
The vocal minority are throwing Brady under the bus. At least it ought to be the minority, hence the question.
We are talking about fan loyalty.
Fans calling for dumping Brady are pathetic.
It's actually more appreciation than loyalty. Witnessing the GOAT and whatvhe did just 4 months ago then wanting to dump him for an unproven kid represents a lack of appreciation of the talent you have witnessed and horrible critical thinking skills.With the exception of one year of Troy Brown, agreed.
But right. And "loyalty" is even more nonsensical regarding fans. We have no say on anything. I suppose it means we should be prepared to cry or boycott the team or something if Brady leaves? Is this a forum of 8 year old boys?
--Then think more carefully about your thread titlesIt's actually more appreciation than loyalty. Witnessing the GOAT and whatvhe did just 4 months ago then wanting to dump him for an unproven kid represents a lack of appreciation of the talent you have witnessed and horrible critical thinking skills.
Thanks for the unsolicited advice.--Then think more carefully about your thread titles
Don't worry, unless and until something severe happens to Brady you won't have to worry about that.--What Belichick decides is fine by me. If he ultimately chooses JG, I'll take his "horrible critical thinking skills" over yours
Those first forty minutes were mediocre but so what? People have bad stretches. Brady over shot Edelman on a few throws and tossed the INT but he was being clobbered and his receivers were being tightly covered/held.It isn't 40 min vs 20 min. It's games 1-19. It's the ability to overcome adversity and make plays throughout a season.
The first 40 min? The Falcons surprised the Pats with a cover 2 robber defense and it took awhile for Brady and McDaniels to adapt the game plan to it hence the numerous sideline passes later in the game. Meanwhile the Atl offense was shredding the Pats D with big play after big play. They of course adjusted too.
Drew? Drew came off of a 5-11 season and started the 2001 season 0-2. Brady is coming off of a SB championship.
Bernie kosar?? C'mon man.
Also, Brady IS 40.I don't know why anyone thinks that BB retaining Garropollo this year was anything more than him thinking it was the best option for the team. He obviously didn't covet anyone in the first round of the draft & if he traded Jimmy G and Brissette was not ready to step in & be Brady's back-up, then he'd have to go spend money on a vet QB AND pay the first rounder he just drafted. He chose to build the team through trades & signing older players instead. Nothing to see here. Not until we see how this season goes.
Fair enough,It's not the thread that's stupid it's the posts and opinions that inspired it.
And you are 100% right.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










