Uptown
Standin' Pat
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2016
- Messages
- 18,511
- Reaction score
- 38,252
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.did BB say publicly that he was out of shape and lacked technique?
That was the discussion.
He did not.
I'm sorry you cannot accept that is the end of the story and I'm kinda having fun watching you have 2 separate arguments in one thread where you can't understand what people say is actually defined by what they say.
What language is your primary language?
I hear these are the Joint experts hired to help Rivers improve his Joints.Glad that concussions are taken more seriously now . but wasn't really worried about Wise after seeing slow-mo. And after seeing him so confident on the line I am actually at peace w him missing a couple of weeks of bloodbath considering his inj. history and need at position. He's very intelligent and mature, no worries about him really other than his joints..
Of course it was but then you weren't part of it so maybe you don't know.That was your discussion which was not the original discussion. But that's classic Andy and his wheel of fortune debate tactics. "How am I going to be right about something next"
I've said the same thing all along. BB did not say those things.You're only "kinda" having fun? I'm having a blast watching you do the classic Andy twist and shake dance.
Oh I get it. So disagreeing is a fit of rage? So then you are now in a hissy fit of rage because instead of just indicating disagreement you are making dozens of posts. I see.By the way you're not having fun. You red x'd me in a fit of rage. Calm down. It'll be ok.
It's the one where I say the poster was arguing hogan is easier to replace, you said he wasn't a d I quoted the words hogan is easier to replace from his post and you still say he isn't.Is this a new argument or a continuation of an old one? Just want to know if I'm arguing deflections or not?
I would LOVE to have Bates & his athleticism be part of our LB group, but I didn't notice him making any plays vs the JAGs on Thursday. Maybe I've missed and/or forgotten some of them?I beg your pardon! Maine is not "Nowhere"!
Okay, so, yeah, Nowhere is just around the corner, but still ...
Anyway, aside from his 4.78/40, Bates (6020/247) had pretty good testing numbers, including a 1.57/10yd and a 6.75 3-cone. And he's apparently got a chip on his shoulder about being overlooked.
It's the one where I say the poster was arguing hogan is easier to replace, you said he wasn't a d I quoted the words hogan is easier to replace from his post and you still say he isn't.
There are no deflections just you thinking when someone says something it means they didn't say it.
He literally said hogan is easier to replace than amendola. Literally.Wrong again. I explained it multiple times but you would rather argue than discuss. It's your MO. It's who you are. You can't help yourself.
It had nothing to do with player vs player.
Ironically you're arguing over something that was originally misrepresented. hahaha Funny you're doing the same thing you're ****ting all over Patsboy for.
Of course it was but then you weren't part of it so maybe you don't know.
I've said the same thing all along. BB did not say those things.
How is that twisting when, you know, he didn't say them.
Oh I get it. So disagreeing is a fit of rage? So then you are now in a hissy fit of rage because instead of just indicating disagreement you are making dozens of posts. I see.
@Tony2046 and @AndyJohnson
C'mon guys. You're better than this. I respect both of you as posters; there's no need for the barbs. Just let this go. Football is back. We're excited for our team. Let's focus on that.
He literally said hogan is easier to replace than amendola. Literally.
I am going to do you a favor though. Since I am trying to discuss football and you are choosing to spend your night taking about me I am going to free you from your obsession with me and just stop responding.
Hopefully in the future you can spend your time on a football board taking about football rather than me.
Well, given that Hogan tied D. Jackson as the league leader in yards per reception in 2016, he is already top-five deep threat and looks like he is continuing that trend in training camp this year.
NFL Yards per Reception Year-by-Year Leaders | Pro-Football-Reference.com
Deus....wrong again.
Only a fool would measure deep threats simply by YPC.
Only a fool would measure deep threats simply by YPC.
By the way, the NFL's top 5 YPC for 2016 were actually
Kapri Bibbs - 37.5 ypc
Josh Doctson - 33.0 ypc
Quinton Dunbar - 31.0 ypc
Bryce Treggs - 25.7 ypc
Tavarres King - 25.0 ypc
So, by your metric, there are the top 5 deep threats in the NFL.