- Joined
- Apr 24, 2015
- Messages
- 17,539
- Reaction score
- 41,067
Right because I've made like 3 posts saying I disagree. Wow. What a nightmare.
Well again you missed the whole point. You are disagreeing about something that was never said. hahahaha
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Right because I've made like 3 posts saying I disagree. Wow. What a nightmare.
To be honest I haven't even tracked a single play of his. But now that's it's on my radar I'm going to pay a little more attention next game. Could be one of those out of nowhere guys.
No it's a classic accuracy matters response.That's a classic Andy in Wonderland's rabbit hole response.
BB made no comment ever saying he was out if shape. BB made no comment ever saying he played with a lack of technique.BB didn't make those exact comments rather someone else did and therefor Patsboy's original post of attributing Cannon's improvement to Scar's return is false???
No you don't.Got it.
If he said he thought those things or remembered something about it, no issuePersonally I can see how he interpreted, from memory, being in better shape into not being in shape the year before. And I can also see how he interpreted Scar's statement of not using his hands and long arms properly into poor technique. IOW, he didn't make things up as you implied.
But I think you're pissed off because those comments, regardless of how he interpreted them, caught you off guard. You got caught with your pants down Andy and had to desperately spin the argument from who's responsible for Cannon's improvement to whether BB said out of shape or better shape. Nice try btw.
Anyways to answer the question I think Patsboy correct in that Scar had to a lot to do with Cannon's technical improvement, Cannon healed up and worked his ass off, and BB was happy that Cannon showed up in better shape. That was the original disc
Umm the entire discussion was that hogan could be traded because he is easier to replace than amendola.Well again you missed the whole point. You are disagreeing about something that was never said. hahahaha
Umm the entire discussion was that hogan could be traded because he is easier to replace than amendola.
No it's a classic accuracy matters response.
BB made no comment ever saying he was out if shape. BB made no comment ever saying he played with a lack of technique.
How can showing BB said he has never not been in shape and someone else commenting on his technique equal BB saying those things?
No you don't.
If he said he thought those things or remembered something about it, no issue
He didn't he says BB said them.
That is making something up because BB didn't say that.
You can justify it all you want but he did not say those things which is EXACTLY what I called him out about.
How in the world am I caught off guard by someone making something up?
If that is his opinion about Cannon that's fine he is entitled to it.
But that's not what he said. I am not ouased at all I am actually laughing at people trying to defend how BB not saying something means he said it.
I'm not sure where you think I even entered an argument about whether those comments would even be accurate because I didn't. That discussion never started
And I give the player credit for what the player accomplished and see no need to make things up in order to try to take that credit away. End of story.
Not my fault you can't comprehend and decide to keep this going.Great googly moogly
I can't believe you just threw the "end of story" smackaroo at me.
Andy and "End of Story" have never existed in the same universe.
You could take an argument over the size of a bull's horns, twist spin a drag us all the way to the bull's ass and turn the whole argument into bull ****.
Classic Andy.
They put him in various positions. He held the edge both left and right effectively. He dropped back in coverage as the mike (I think) and he covered up a RB coming out in the flat decently.
But it was a preseason game. I didn't see any bad plays but wasn't really focused on him either.
Bates wasn't good in the first game... He made Freeny look All-Pro, imho..
Uh huh. So Scar mentioning Cannon not using his length to his advantage isn't in reference to technique? And Bill saying he is in better shape isn't an inference that he wasn't in the best shape before?
If it isn't...
Not my fault you can't comprehend and decide to keep this going.
Just do what a quite a few people have started doing and put him on the ignore list for a few weeks. The quality of life on this forum increases substantially.
Bates wasn't good in the first game... He made Freeny look All-Pro, imho..
Umm, no it wasn't. Missed again.
Hogan is easier to replace than Amendola. Cooks and to some extend Mitchell can take over Hogan's routes whereas apart from Edelman there is nobody that can do Dola's job. It is that easy.
Oh really because it's pretty much word for word
did BB say publicly that he was out of shape and lacked technique?I know Andy. It's frustrating when people don't agree with you and twist your innocent words into nefarious meanings.
I can sympathize.
Btw: I thought you said "End of Story".
What language is your primary language?Wrong again.
| 226 | 29K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











