long distance
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2015
- Messages
- 10,307
- Reaction score
- 27,270
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.If you read between the lines..you know very well he was saying Cannon wasn't the in the greatest shape without flat out coming out and saying it. Just by saying not that he was in bad, but is better now is saying he wasn't in the best shape previously.
Also, nice cherry picking of Scars ending comment. Purposefully left out the part about not using his arms to his advantage. Again, I'd say that's technique.
These are connections that a 1st grader can easily make.
Despite AD unable to provide her with some footage . our Doc is optimistic as well..
____
now i can safely say this joint was a success..
So you think that is 90% Bill Belichick SAYING that Cannon was out of shape and played with a lack of technique.BTW: You seeing 5% when everyone else sees closer to 90% is classic Andy. Patsboy didn't make anything up and it's easy to see how he interpreted that into what he said.
When you are talking about which player is more replaceable, yeah, its about the actual players.Are you still stuck on player vs player? hahahaha
Too funny.
Sorry, I don't read between lines to conclude someone says something that is the opposite of what they say.
It's called context. And people are all over him today skipping the Jets when talking about Crennel. Why did he do it..what did he mean?
It's basic context.
No, it's a ridiculously poor attempt at the reading of context, which is not the same thing.
So you think that is 90% Bill Belichick SAYING that Cannon was out of shape and played with a lack of technique.
Its very "Andy" because I deal with the facts. OMG here is a positive comment about his conditioning, that must be 90% proof he felt negatively. Give me a break.
If 'everyone' takes things to not mean what they say, then I am happy to be in disagreement with 'everyone'.
When you are talking about which player is more replaceable, yeah, its about the actual players.
Nope. I'm saying I can see how Patsboy posted what he did. "Clearly" he didn't make it up.
Does everything set you off?
Not sure what you mean by set off.Nope. I'm saying I can see how Patsboy posted what he did. "Clearly" he didn't make it up.
Does everything set you off?
Right because I've made like 3 posts saying I disagree. Wow. What a nightmare.Then you've missed the whole point.
I'm sure that could have been an interesting discussion but as usual it has turned into some kind of Andygeddon end of the world BS.
Who the hell is "him?"What? You don't think I can get him to agree on something?
He said Belichick said he was out of shape and played with a lack of technique.Sure that's fair but I can see how Patsboy interpreted that into what he posted. IOW, he wasn't making things up which is what was implied.
Strange to say but very accurate. Gronk and Cooks are the top 2 knockout artists on the offense
White, DLew, Jules, DA and MM are the jabs and body shots.
Hogan is the kick in the balls.
Uh huh. So Scar mentioning Cannon not using his length to his advantage isn't in reference to technique? And Bill saying he is in better shape isn't an inference that he wasn't in the best shape before?
If it isn't...
Not sure what you mean by set off.
The guy made an incorrect statement and I called him out on it.
Just to be clear. What I called him out on was him saying BELICHICK MADE THOSE COMMFNTS. We all know he wouldn't. It's lazy posting.
Now as far as the 90% comment if BB said Cannon was a fat slob who couldn't Rex h his toes or run 10 yards that would only be 50%. (Of course he actually said Cannon had never been in bad shape)
There is still a big zero in the column if belichick saying Cannon "played with lack of technique".