- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 30,889
- Reaction score
- 23,851
I'm puzzled by that response. I am not critical of anyone for appreciating Bademosi (I posted "all props to Bademosi" and greatly appreciate what he did last night). I'd be ecstatic if Bademosi can light up practice and force his way into the starting lineup. That almost certainly would mean we will have improved as well as have a new CB who looks to have a bright future. And I am extremely happy about the win (you'll see my postings that I thought our chances to win were tangible and our D was/would be looking up).
But I am critical of those taking one game and extrapolating it into Bademosi should be Gillmore's replacement. That's game day thread style hysterics that should be called out. Gilmore is a 5 year(??) starter with pretty decent, or better, credentials. Bademosi is a rookie with barely more experience than 7 days. That's not unappreciative of Bademosi or peeing in anyone's fruitcup -- as it were -- it's peeing on the inability of posters to see beyond one game/ability to overlook some pretty solid facts.
TWO games - - he was impressive last week also against NYJ.
But, yes, no decisions should be made based on two games, or the previous ones for Gilmore. Starting in a game should be predicated upon who has the best week of practice and preparation. If BB sees Gilmore as the most ready, then it should be Gilmore. If otherwise, it should be otherwise. Simple as that. And that's how he operates.
.











