luuked
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 20,259
- Reaction score
- 37,772
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I’m assuming you guys resent Decker for his handsomeness.
I know how it feels, Decker.
I think it was some kind of run in with fans he had at another team that rubbed me the wrong wayI’m assuming you guys resent Decker for his handsomeness.
I know how it feels, Decker.
People are worrying way too much about the WRs IMO. It is only 4 games until we get Edelman back. In those 4 games you just rely a little more on the TEs and RBs. We have had games where the offense drop 30 burgers without the WR core getting much more than 100 yards total in the air.
Between Gronk, Hollister, Allen, White and Burkhead they won't lack targets. And that is assuming Michel isn't ready to go week 1.
Betwen all those guys and Hogan, Dorsett and whatever Patterson, Britt or Decker gives you it will be fine. Even if Both Decker and Britt are cut I am really not that worried about it as long as the TE and RB groups are healthy and ready to go.
It isn't like we will be facing any offensive juggernauts in the first 4 games where we will need to score more than 30 to win most likely.
The only team that MAYBE could put up 30 on offense is Houston but I think their offense will take a step back from the totals they put up with Watson at the helm last year. With a year of tape on him I expect Watson to have a sophomore slump. When it comes to the other 3 teams if they put up just 24 that is probably enough to win those games if they don't give up a cheep STs or defensive score.
I can now see why BB was looking at receivers before the draft. I wish they would have paid Amendola.
I never really followed him other than when he was playing vs the Pats and he looked pretty good (not great other than that Jets game). Don’t remember the run in but of course I believe you.I think it was some kind of run in with fans he had at another team that rubbed me the wrong way
We'll be fine when our #2 WR show that he can beat man coverage consistently. Remember Hogan will be seeing CB #1 for Four Weeks and Gronk will be Doubled consistently. Some Defenses won't mind conceding short yardage to our RB's and play Bend but don't break down the Field. If our #2 WR Option struggle while Edelman is out we'll be scoring a lot of FG's early on if Ghost cooperates.
Disagree. Patterson won’t okay every down but I think it will be more like 25-30 than 5-10. I think he gets 5-10 touches/targets a game.
Wr2 plays 60 snaps WR3 plays 40 ish.30 snaps a game for Toast Patterson seems high. Thats WR2/WR3 snaps here.
With that said he might line up as a RB, slot, H-Back -type sets.
I guess its possible...
We'll be fine when our #2 WR show that he can beat man coverage consistently. Remember Hogan will be seeing CB #1 for Four Weeks and Gronk will be Doubled consistently. Some Defenses won't mind conceding short yardage to our RB's and play Bend but don't break down the Field. If our #2 WR Option struggle while Edelman is out we'll be scoring a lot of FG's early on if Ghost cooperates.
Remember, Peters erased Hogan in week one last year.
They doubled Cooks and singled Hogan with Peters.Hogan 1 catch 8 measly yards in that game.
I like calling him "Toast". Reminds me of my teenager years.Wr2 plays 60 snaps WR3 plays 40 ish.
I see Patterson as WR4 who takes a handful of snaps from WR 1,2,3 and from TE2.
ELVIS Patterson was TOAST because he was a corner who got burned. Doesn’t really fit for a WR.
I just never understood why fans deride and make fun of players on the team they root for.I like calling him "Toast". Reminds me of my teenager years.