That's simply not true. Either you haven't bothered to read the thread, or you've decided to completely ignore it.
And, yet again, you get it wrong. It's evidence of an absence (in this case, the absence of a negative response), which was what my point was.
I'm trying to figure out whether the problem is that you don't know what the word assumption means, or that you do know what it means but prefer to keep tossing out strawmen.
Reading is fundamental. You should actually read the thread, and the articles, and listen to the Carter clip, before posting.
Here's me, for example, AVOIDING assumptions:
And here are current, and former, OL teammates talking about the "N" word, its impact on how they viewed Incognito, and the issues or, rather, the absence of any issues, it caused among those not named Jonathan Martin (and even among those who are named Jonathan Martin):
Again, I'm not the one making assumptions here. You're the one doing that.