Stidham had a pretty solid rookie year from all reports. He impressed in camp and during the preseason.
Maybe yes, maybe no. Or maybe he was just another in a line of those glowing reports and preseason games that include Markell Carter, Zach Sudfeld and Kanorris Davis.
Let's not forget that all these reporters have to write a column every day. Glowing preseason reports of 7-on-7 drills don't mean a whole lot, nor do preseason games that contain no game plan, played against third stringers.
He obviously did not play because we had Brady.
Yes, obviously.
Last year due to Covid, there was no off-season but the Pats did not draft a QB so the consensus was that Stidham would be our starter. That was the belief until we signed Cam on June 28.
I don't recall any kind of consensus about Stidham on that matter.
Speculation based on the limited number of possibilities, yes; consensus, no.
Again, what we as fans believe based on limited information and media reports is irrelevant.
It's possible that during the time of the draft until June 28, Stidham failed to show the staff enough that he would be the starter.
Stidham not only failed to show enough to be the starter, he also failed to show enough to pass 35-year old career backup Brian Hoyer as the primary backup.
Occam's Razor: Which is more likely? That in a matter of just eight weeks Stidham regressed from being the starter, to Hoyer's backup? Or that Stidham was never was good as he is being portrayed here?
And as bad as Cam played, Bill still thought Cam was better than the Stidham.
Which means that Stidham must have been really, really bad.
The correlation is, Stidham was a second year player
Yes, Stidham was a second year player. Too early to give up on a fourth round draft pick.
who never got a start after having a pretty solid rookie year.
Going 2-4 with a 25% interception rate and passer rating of 18.7 is now a 'pretty solid year'?
The chances of Jones being able to do enough to get a start this year...
Is pretty high considering what we saw from Cam last year.
with the complexity of our offense and Cam's veteran knowledge of the position
Some players pick it up right away (Welker, Moss, Gronk) while others don't (Galloway, Ochocinco).
means there is no chance we see Jones.
I'll just write this off as an over the top exaggeration.
Bill's bar for Cam is extremely high compared to rookie which is why right after we drafted Jones, he said Jones had a lot to learn and needed to compete with Stidham first before Cam.
Same thing that Belichick says about every rookie, every year. And yet every year there are rookie starters.
It is doubtful he even beats out Stid for the back-up given we are looking at another shortened off-season and Stidham being in his third year.
If Jones can't beat the guy who was third on the depth chart behind Hoyer a year ago, then this was a monumentally bad draft pick.
So, it is Cam for this entire year unless he gets hurt.
That is one possibility but far from being some sort of fait accompli. Another possibility is that (b) it could also be Cam in Week One, until Jones has progressed enough to earn the starting position; or (c) it could be Cam to start the season, until he again starts playing like he did for much of Oct-Nov-Dec of 2020, and Jones takes over; or (d) a combination of both b and c.