- Joined
- Feb 27, 2010
- Messages
- 12,090
- Reaction score
- 17,862
You answered it yourself. Allen is a TE, Derby is essentially a WR.
But is Allen really helping as a blocker?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You answered it yourself. Allen is a TE, Derby is essentially a WR.
What's concerning is that he continued to have headaches long after the Tampa Bay game had been played, and that they were bad enough to force a surprise rule out the night before the game after no other mention all week.Concerned about Gilmore. We've seen long term concussion absences before.
But is Allen really helping as a blocker?
What's concerning is that he continued to have headaches long after the Tampa Bay game had been played, and that they were bad enough to force a surprise rule out the night before the game after no other mention all week.
I'd be shocked if he played in Sunday's game, and with Sanu coming back today, that's bad news. He and Jones are obviously both physical receivers, and that's not bringing up a guy like Gabriel who is much better than the JAGs seen lately. I don't see how we have the personnel to match up like that.
I dont know. That depends on the gameplan.
But if something were to happen to Gronk what would be more scarce ? Pass catching options or capable blockers that can affect the opponents formation ? Similarly, lets see how all of this looks when we get into Dec/Jan when the emphasis on running the ball will be stronger.
Something did happen to Gronk, and the result was we pretty much played as if there was no tight end position. I don't see how what we've seen from Allen shows he will be an asset when running becomes more important. He hasn't even been a good blocker.
No. He’s been terrible at that, too.But is Allen really helping as a blocker?
Something did happen to Gronk, and the result was we pretty much played as if there was no tight end position. I don't see how what we've seen from Allen shows he will be an asset when running becomes more important. He hasn't even been a good blocker.
No. He’s been terrible at that, too.
Not if the role is to block.
Would have had a couple catches already if that scrub QB of ours could place the ball accurately. Again, if you think he should be anything else than a 25-30 catches guy then it is your own fault you are disappointed.
That is the moment I stopped caring about your opinion.
Can you cite some plays of him not being a good blocker? He's been pretty solid in the run game for blocking. I saw maybe one or two blocks where it didn't go right. One had to have been a mental error, the other maybe he should have attacked the linebacker who pulled back? I don't know. Maybe he's not supposed to do that. But that's all I've seen. Otherwise his blocking has been solid from what I saw.
Depends on whether or not you wish to believe ESPN, but Josina Anderson reported that it occurred during the Tampa Bay game. It supposedly happeneded on a helmet collision with Mike Evans.Did we actually get any confirmation that he sustained a concussion against TB ? What if he sustained this in practice, thought he could push through it but realized late that it wouldnt work out ? Not trying to grasp for straws but do we know anything so far except that he sustained a concussion ?
Thanks for at least backing your opinion up rather than being a snide little **** with a one liner about "this is why your opinion doesn't matter."
Can you actually think of any plays in particular? This first down play might be the one @Wheelman is referring to:
Although it looks like a failed block by Allen, it is more nuanced IMO. The Pats are running a draw play, and it looks like Allen begins a backpedal as if he is pass blocking. The goal is to get the DE to pass rush himself out of the play. If Allen engages in a block past the line of scrimmage, the defense can read that as a run key. Unfortunately, the DL stayed home on this play and were ready for the draw.
Thanks for at least backing your opinion up rather than being a snide little **** with a one liner about "this is why your opinion doesn't matter."
Honestly I see sanu as a jag.What's concerning is that he continued to have headaches long after the Tampa Bay game had been played, and that they were bad enough to force a surprise rule out the night before the game after no other mention all week.
I'd be shocked if he played in Sunday's game, and with Sanu coming back today, that's bad news. He and Jones are obviously both physical receivers, and that's not bringing up a guy like Gabriel who is much better than the JAGs seen lately. I don't see how we have the personnel to match up like that.
Once the season starts what he is paid is irrelevant.For 5 snaps a game to get paid 6 Million a year?
Sanu's career high is 59 receptions and his career avg us under 12 ypc.
Never understood why people think this guy is anything special.
He caught 2 passes for 25 yards. How does that impress you?He was killing Rowe with these in or out cuts, stop on a dime, do a 180 the other way. That's how he caught his balls in Super Bowl LI. He was actually open for I think 2 more times in that game doing that but the pressure got to Matt Ryan.
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 6 - May 21 (Through 26yrs)










