Jetssuck
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 199
- Reaction score
- 71
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.that is defending ones self from repetitive criticism.
My I.Q was brought into question. Lets keep the discussion on thread and not deviate.
Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.Manning ain't that good, that's why Brady has more SB appearances and wins.
Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.
This is classic. Epic even. The lizard brain has been activated.
The point is that the Denver offense is talented enough even without Manning to be successful in different offensive systems. That they could still be successful without Manning is the equivalent of your point that the Patriots could be successful without Brady. Understood?
The Patriots went from 18-1 with Brady in 2007 to 11-5 with Matt Cassel in 2008. That's 7 fewer wins. The Colts went from 10-7 with Manning in 2010 to 2-14 with Mo, Larry, and Curly. That's 8 fewer wins. A total win difference of only 1.
The fundamental difference is that tebow pretty much made our passing game and recievers non existent. Look at our recievers numbers and passing yds compared to last season. At least casell was/is a semi good QB with passing ability.
Omg what the hell are you talking about haha?
And i have zero respect for your 'system' QB that has the skills that can be matched by matt cassell lol. Brady fails in any other team.
The fundamental difference is that tebow pretty much made our passing game and recievers non existent. Look at our recievers numbers and passing yds compared to last season. At least casell was/is a semi good QB with passing ability.
Haha your funny. Might as well up my post count with him. I can go way deeper. What I find funny is how someone calls a QB a system qb. Yeah we look at a QB but the ravens won by their D in 2000, you have to be good in all 3 phase with playmakers. That's what every Super Bowl team has. It proves if you have the D and a guy with talented receivers you don't need a excellent QB. But when you have a excellent QB in our case you don't need a strong D. Now Denver has a great QB but not one that can get it done during prime time. And now he has a team with a good D and O. So they have done good but now its the playoffs. Brady has proven to be a super elite Q that can carry us at times.Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.
This is classic. Epic even. The lizard brain has been activated.
Omg what the hell are you talking about haha?
Patriots 18-1 to 11-5
Colts 10-7 to 2-14
How hard could it be to understand. The drop off in wins was basically the same in the Patriots without Brady and the Colts without Manning.
The Pats in 2008 had 7 fewer wins without Brady than the previous year with Brady. The Colts in 2011 had 8 fewer wins without Manning than the previous year with Manning.
And i have zero respect for your 'system' QB that has the skills that can be matched by matt cassell lol. Brady fails in any other team.
If you make it past the divisionals ... I'll look forward to hittin your country azz with a heavy dose of 'the system'. And don't wear those fugly orange shirts... you'll look bad enough against a real team.