- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,796
- Reaction score
- 22,631
That 4th WR that we never use is missing for 4 weeks. Cancel the season.What uncertainty on offense ? Seriously what the hell are people smoking ?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The Athletic | Posted: 06/22 New! |
| What we learned from every NFL team during offseason workouts |
Boston.com | Posted: 06/21 👁: 26 |
| Watch: Julian Edelman helps Scotland fans place traffic cone atop George Washington statue in Boston |
MassLive | Posted: 06/21 👁: 136 |
| Karen Guregian: 5 up, 5 down from Patriots OTAs and minicamp |
MassLive | Posted: 06/20 👁: 33 |
| Former Patriots star Rob Gronkowski attends Scotland-Morocco, has favorite Euro star |
The Athletic | Posted: 06/20 👁: 22 |
| Want to keep the Boston-Scotland party going? Get the New England Patriots involved |
| Welcome to New England - Illinois Edge Gabe Jacas! (2nd round, #55) 3 Reactions | 06/22 at 5:31 am |
| Welcome Caleb Lomu OT Utah 2 Reactions | 06/21 at 9:01 pm |
Steve Balestrieri
| TODAY'S TOP POSTERS: | # | |
| Family | 6 posts | |
| 1960Pats | 5 posts | |
| mayoclinic | 5 posts | |
| Wozzy | 4 posts | |
| rkarp1 | 3 posts |
That 4th WR that we never use is missing for 4 weeks. Cancel the season.What uncertainty on offense ? Seriously what the hell are people smoking ?
That 4th WR that we never use is missing for 4 weeks
He is wr2 or WR3 for the first 4 games, but your point is taken.Don't have any idea why because of the system the Patriots run don't usually have this happen (Jonas Gray aside) but the 4th receiver (Patterson) going off in weeks 1 and 2 just seems eminently plausible to me.
Yeah I should've clarified that. Edit made.He is wr2 or WR3 for the first 4 games
Edelman Hogan Mitchell and DA in 2016 is an example of having 4 WRs on the roster being useful.That 4th WR that we never use is missing for 4 weeks. Cancel the season.
(defensively)This. It's really not.
The 2011 team that made the Super Bowl was far, far weaker than this one.
That WR4 is completely meaningless until either or both of your top 2 targets with injury history go down for the season.That 4th WR that we never use is missing for 4 weeks. Cancel the season.
Are we grading all teams by what they will be if their best players get injured?That WR4 is completely meaningless until either or both of your top 2 targets with injury history go down for the season.
The uncertainty on offense probably revolves around depth, not the perfect world scenario of none of our top players getting injured
2016 was sort of an exception. Even in 2016 Amendola and Mitchell pretty much shared the WR3 role. We wouldn’t have been screwed with my one or the other as we saw last year when Amendola basically replaced both of them.Edelman Hogan Mitchell and DA in 2016 is an example of having 4 WRs on the roster being useful.
They'll get by with Hogs, Dorsett and Patterson until Jules returns but to say they never use/need a WR4 is not accurate.
Me? No cause I don't know **** about any other teams. I'm just saying, I get the uncertainty. We've had depth before offensively, I think we're a little thinner this year than we have been since 2013. Not just at WR but at OT too with Cannon's injury history and Wynn being out for the yearAre we grading all teams by what they will be if their best players get injured?
That 4th WR that we never use is missing for 4 weeks. Cancel the season.
| 79 | 4K |
| 20 | 691 |
| 20 | 2K |
| 166 | 13K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 7 - June 22 (Through 26yrs)











