Ice_Ice_Brady
where black is the color where none is the number
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,979
- Reaction score
- 53,352
exactly, thats what makes Brady the GOAT. The GOAT QB debate used to have 2 camps. The winning camp championed Montana, the stats camp championed Marino.
Brady has both.
He is the GOAT at winning as a QB (>.750 winning %, most postseason wins, 11 AFCCG appearances, 7 SB appearances, 5 rings).
He also has the stats:
4th all time in yards (61582)
4th all time in TD (456)
3rd all time in passer rating (97.3)
4th all time in completions (5244)
@JetFan79
I think Brady is the GOAT, but I frankly don't care if someone wants to consider Montana or Elway as the GOAT (I certainly think Elway would be a huge homer pick, though,)
I don't think you can be the GOAT without a bunch of iconic moments and those iconic moments are often in the postseason. You don't read a lot of NFL lore decades later about winning regular season MVPs. It isn't Manning's "only two rings," it's his lack of heroics despite having as many opportunities as any other QB not named Brady. What exactly do you think of when you look back at Manning? Coming out of the regular season finale after achieving his end goal of exactly 4,500 yards? Winning SB MVP with the lowest QB rating to win the award in NFL history? Being absolutely carried by his defense in both SB runs (after years of excuses that the defense was garbage)? Regular season records? Maybe some egghead will make statistical arguments that Manning was the GOAT. Fine. No sports star in any major sport will be considered the greatest without a legendary series of stories. That's where Montana, Elway, etc enter the discussion and won't get the type of strong reaction that you'll see when someone brings up Manning. Too many huge failures to count and so few actual heroics under pressure when it counted. This is one reason it hits a nerve here.












