- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,878
- Reaction score
- 66,861
In the copied post, you speak authoritatively about the “THE SCIENCE!” of COVID and the vaccine and speak of how asinine it is to require the vaccine given that “natural immunity” is as good as, or better than, “vaccine immunity”. I have to ask: Is science in general and the science of COVID and vaccines specifically something you have expertise in? If so, could you provide a scientific explanation of your statement that isn’t the type of anti-science following-the-herd misinformation that seems to becoming so prevalent?
No, I'm not going to play either the credentials game or the appeal to authority game. And the point of "THE SCIENCE" is that we've gotten a ****load of false information from those claiming to be in the know, a ****load of conflicting information from those claiming to be in the know, a ****load of debunked and/or changed assertions by those claiming to be in the know, a lot of mythology that has been repeated so often that people have bought into the ********, and that the latest released study (at least the latest known to me up to the time of my post) had natural > vaccine. And that's even before we start counting all the people who've had the shots, supposedly followed protocols (I'm looking at your ridiculous protocols as the #1 example, NFL), and still gotten the virus.
So, rather than go through a billion back-and-forths, let me just make that point to you with two conflicting studies, with the first one showing natural immunity to be stronger, followed by the CDC telling us that the vaccines are losing effectiveness.
Natural immunity from Covid could be stronger than vaccination
Coronavirus Disease 2019
CDC reports decline in vaccine effectiveness, prompting booster decision
You, along with everyone else, are welcome to argue with the studies. You'll have to excuse me if, while that's being done, I just sit back and laugh as people play the pretzel game, insist that they've destroyed the "science" of one side or the other, and so on.












