denverpatsfan
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2004
- Messages
- 7,123
- Reaction score
- 6,109
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.And, we forget that, last year, Brady, for all intents and purposes, played a 15 game season with three Bye weeks: Four Games, Bye, Eight Games, Bye, Two Games, Bye, SB.They're going to need to or Brady won't last the season. Can't let a 40 year old absorb the kind of shots he's absorbing. He's as tough as they come, but the body simply doesn't recover like it used to at that age.
He is hanging onto the ball longer this season. I don't have the stat but am betting on it. Not having JE11 as a quick safety valve doesn't help either. Solder is obviously not 100% and that is an issue too.
Brady has to throw more often in order to out-score the opponent, so it stands to reason that he would be sacked more often too. My question is, are these sacks/total hits taken the result merely of a similar increase in pass attempts, or is he actually being hit at a greater percentage than 2014/2016?
Year Sk%
2001* 9.0
2002 4.9
2003 5.7
2004* 5.2
2005* 4.7
2006 4.8
2007*+ 3.5
2008 0.0
2009* 2.8
2010*+ 4.8
2011* 5.0
2012* 4.1
2013* 6.0
2014* 3.5
2015* 5.7
2016* 3.4
2017 7.7
Career 4.9
I remember a time when that statement would've been considered preposterous. He certainly redeemed himself last year, but this season so far has been rough for Cannon.Good thing Cannon is back playing, too
Stats say otherwise. He was about 0.3 seconds longer than last year as I recall. Sorry I don't have the link.If anything, Brady is getting rid of the ball quicker this season. The tackle who is not 100% is Cannon.
Tom wants to break Tony Eason's record.Tom Brady on pace to get sacked a career-high 52 times
Clearly our defense is #1 concern, but this is really worrying. Regardless of age, our QB can't be hit all game, no QB could go through 16 games + playoffs unscratched like this.
Scar needs to work his magic fast. Good thing Cannon is back playing, too
Not surprised. he's throwing the long ball a lot and more screens so they take longer to develop. It's only partly Edelman not being there.Stats say otherwise. He was about 0.3 seconds longer than last year as I recall. Sorry I don't have the link.
What are you assuming is going to change?
Don't be so harsh on Marcus Cannon he's battling ankle problems. That turn-style
Nate Solder needs to be replaced he's looked horrible every game.
Replaced with who? do you see a top ten or 20 pick coming our way? Most teams are struggling to fill the LT spot.
Sometimes I wonder if certain posters here watch any other games to see what the actually bad players in the NFL look like.
Sack rate as % of snaps is his highest since 2001.
Code:Year Sk% 2001* 9.0 2002 4.9 2003 5.7 2004* 5.2 2005* 4.7 2006 4.8 2007*+ 3.5 2008 0.0 2009* 2.8 2010*+ 4.8 2011* 5.0 2012* 4.1 2013* 6.0 2014* 3.5 2015* 5.7 2016* 3.4 2017 7.7 Career 4.9
Provided by Pro-Football-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/3/2017.
I'm not a draft or college football guy so I have no idea but I'll bet you dollars to donuts that the Pats take a LT with their 1 or 2 pick.
I thought Solder played much better this past week.Solder has way underperformed his $10m per year 2 year extension that (at the time) gave him Top 5 Tackle money. Seems he checked out after he was guaranteed $20m. Garbage last year, garbage in playoffs, garbage in Superbowl, garbage this year.
The only good thing he does is have the decency help a dazed/disoriented Tom Brady back to his feet after he gets tossed around to give up yet another sack.
Don't be so harsh on Marcus Cannon he's battling ankle problems. That turn-style
Nate Solder needs to be replaced he's looked horrible every game.