libra957
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,924
- Reaction score
- 1,993
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I actually thought this was an interesting thing to research, so here is what I came up with (I did not do in depth research, so these definitely may be off a game or 2 here and there):Lets list the records of all the great coaches without their HOF QBs. This media stat is the most overrated stat. BB himself says its a players game . Players win games and coach lose them . Yet people think BB calls himself greater than the players and keep saying Brady is more important.
Yeah that’s fine. I take it as a complimentI hope you don't mind but I took a lot of your write here which is excellent and used it on another Pats forum, putting in my own spin. LOL
Your points here are excellent and well articulated. I keep hearing but, but we won 3 SBs. That is not the point of the discussion of the current state of the team which you lay out perfectly in this post.
Name a single receiver Brady "froze out" that went on to accomplish anything of note elsewhere. F'in Scotty Miller is catching sideline bombs from Brady every week in Tampa, but he wouldn't have wanted to throw to Metcalf. Right.Would probably be getting sh!t on by this board like Harry is. People really think a go-route guy was coming into the Pats offense with Brady as QB and becoming what he has become in Seattle? Nah. He would have f**ked up one too many times and Brady would have froze him out like he's done to guys before.
Would probably be getting sh!t on by this board like Harry is. People really think a go-route guy was coming into the Pats offense with Brady as QB and becoming what he has become in Seattle? Nah. He would have f**ked up one too many times and Brady would have froze him out like he's done to guys before.
I don’t think too many are getting “a thrill” out of calling out Belichick.
And none of them had a cap to worry about.I actually thought this was an interesting thing to research, so here is what I came up with (I did not do in depth research, so these definitely may be off a game or 2 here and there):
Bill Belichick (without Brady): 56-68, 1-1 in the playoffs
Don Shula (I took away his best QB, Dan Marino, but that leaves HoFer Bob Griese in these stats): 181-63, 2 Super Bowl Championships
Bill Walsh (without Montana): 8-24
Chuck Noll (without Bradshaw): 86-97, 2-3 in the playoffs
Joe Gibbs: No HoF QB, won SB with 3 different ones. If you take away Theismann, he was 113-78 with 2 SB's.
Bill Parcells: No HoF QB, won SB with 2 different ones (2nd SB was Hostetler in a backup role taking over for an injured Simms)
Tom Landry (without Staubach): 165-133, several playoff appearances and 1 SB appearance, but no championships
Of all of the above, Gibbs was the least reliant on one single player and has the most success with different players. Shula had 2 HoFers so he maintains an impressive record if you only take away 1 of them.
It’s both. He’s entitled to some slack but he also has valid criticismSo what,Bill Belichick is entitled to at least one bad year after two decade of success.
It’s a Pats Forum. What are people supposed to discuss? There’s multiple articles out there. It’s a topic of discussion whether we like it or not.If it's not this "thrill" than what is the malfunction of people posting the same context-less statistics over and over in the same thread?
Neither did their opponents. That aside, I am not sure any of them had GM power the way Belichick does, except maybe Parcells towards the end of his career with the Jets and Cowboys (and his first two years in NE but certainly not his last 2), but those teams were not where he had his success.And none of them had a cap to worry about.
The issue was never that it would be a rebuild year. It is Bill passing the buck and not taking any accountability for the state of the roster.Excellent post
Absolutely
We knew this was a rebuild year. The cap was a total mess due to Brady leaving, Gronk, Gostkowski, like 25M in dead cap money
The issue was never that it would be a rebuild year. It is Bill passing the buck and not taking any accountability for the state of the roster.
This is really interesting. Thanks for taking the time to do this.I actually thought this was an interesting thing to research, so here is what I came up with (I did not do in depth research, so these definitely may be off a game or 2 here and there):
Bill Belichick (without Brady): 56-68, 1-1 in the playoffs
Don Shula (I took away his best QB, Dan Marino, but that leaves HoFer Bob Griese in these stats): 181-63, 2 Super Bowl Championships
Bill Walsh (without Montana): 8-24
Chuck Noll (without Bradshaw): 86-97, 2-3 in the playoffs
Joe Gibbs: No HoF QB, won SB with 3 different ones. If you take away Theismann, he was 113-78 with 2 SB's.
Bill Parcells: No HoF QB, won SB with 2 different ones (2nd SB was Hostetler in a backup role taking over for an injured Simms)
Tom Landry (without Staubach): 165-133, several playoff appearances and 1 SB appearance, but no championships
Of all of the above, Gibbs was the least reliant on one single player and has the most success with different players. Shula had 2 HoFers so he maintains an impressive record if you only take away 1 of them.
I actually thought this was an interesting thing to research, so here is what I came up with (I did not do in depth research, so these definitely may be off a game or 2 here and there):
Bill Belichick (without Brady): 56-68, 1-1 in the playoffs
Don Shula (I took away his best QB, Dan Marino, but that leaves HoFer Bob Griese in these stats): 181-63, 2 Super Bowl Championships
Bill Walsh (without Montana): 8-24
Chuck Noll (without Bradshaw): 86-97, 2-3 in the playoffs
Joe Gibbs: No HoF QB, won SB with 3 different ones. If you take away Theismann, he was 113-78 with 2 SB's.
Bill Parcells: No HoF QB, won SB with 2 different ones (2nd SB was Hostetler in a backup role taking over for an injured Simms)
Tom Landry (without Staubach): 165-133, several playoff appearances and 1 SB appearance, but no championships
Of all of the above, Gibbs was the least reliant on one single player and has the most success with different players. Shula had 2 HoFers so he maintains an impressive record if you only take away 1 of them.
I am sorry but you're living on a different planet.This is a garbage take. The OL is among the best in the league, so is the defensive backfield, the RB's are deep and talented. The LB'ers and TE's are teenagers but talented. They have good pieces at DT (Guy) but could use some more, and they have some good WR's. The receiving weapons appear worthless because they are allen wrench bolts and Cam is a rubber mallet. With even a "good" not great QB this team is competitive, they don't currently have that. "Lack of talent" is the laziest take on the planet.
Those are all Bill's decisions, correct? I mean he had to take an expensive flyer on AB because he had not drafted any WRs. Same with spending the 2 on Sanu. And he could have easily extended Brady back when Brady asked in 17 and 18 but instead he put 2 dummy years on that created the dead cap. If he did not expect Brady to leave after that than he is truly not as smart as we all have given him credit for. But the point remains, all decisions are Bill's. He made a ton of mistakes the last 6 years with the draft and the handling of the QB position. The issue most of us have is that he won't OWN any of it. His comments insinuate that the state of the team is just the natural process of the way league is structured. That is totally baloney.That is crazy. He was correct that they went all out for Brady. Putting aside the accuracy of the scouting quality he got, he spent a 1st round pick on NKeal Harry and then burned a second round pick for Sanu. Signed AB and then Kraft made him cut AB. Extended a bunch of older guys to keep the run going thinking he still had Brady. So he did moves that were for the short term while having Brady. This is all true. It's not even an excuse, it's fact. And then with Brady leaving that accelerated a 14M dead money cap hit this year just on Brady alone, and plus other players that was 25M in dead cap money.
| 237 | 27K |
| 16 | 4K |
| 45 | 9K |
| 144 | 16K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 13 - April 28 (Through 26yrs)











