Patriots Local News:

SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Boston Sports Journal


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:WEEI

Patsfans.com


Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: Steelers
Sun
Dec 16th
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Shocking Ending
Sunday's loss in Miami was shocking and will likely have the Patriots doing some second-guessing this week.


Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

AFC playoff standings

Discussion in 'NFL Football Forum' started by BobDigital, Dec 3, 2018.

  1. luuked

    luuked Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Messages:
    13,331
    Likes Received:
    4,521
    Ratings:
    +22,922
    I just don't see L. Jackson being able to score enough on KC. But yeah might be another long shot. Sure.
     

  2. 1960Pats

    1960Pats PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,128
    Likes Received:
    2,483
    Ratings:
    +9,258
    Unfortunately, if Philly loses their next two games (at Dallas and at the Rams) the Texans game will be meaningless to them.

    Edit: I see that this has already been discussed. Never mind.
     
  3. Mack Herron

    Mack Herron Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    10,021
    Likes Received:
    3,111
    Ratings:
    +12,705

    The NFL roulette wheel.
     
  4. jradMITEX

    jradMITEX Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +6
    Baltimore does have the number 1 scoring and yardage defense, the Chiefs D has been better at home but is still suspect, sure the Ravens will need some bounces for sure but by no means is this a gimme.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. QB12

    QB12 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,108
    Likes Received:
    165
    Ratings:
    +641
    Oh, so that a potential opposing QB has never beat a Brady-Belichick team has NO relevance? smh
     
  6. mcmurtry86

    mcmurtry86 Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,109
    Likes Received:
    121
    Ratings:
    +909
    I don't see the relevance, other than cherry picking, to exclude the one game he won (and played great in) against the Cassel-led Pats in 2008.

    The 2008 D got lit up by Rivers in that game which should prove that he is capable of beating a Belichick D (and he was one of only 2 QB's to put up 300+ yards passing against the Pats that year).

    Obviously, he has struggled against New England in most of the other games, but he's not incapable of playing well against Belichick teams and the inclusion of Brady is irrelevant since he's not lining up opposite Rivers.
     
  7. BobDigital

    BobDigital Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Messages:
    12,938
    Likes Received:
    3,253
    Ratings:
    +11,655
    My current predictions.

    #1 Pats (they win out)
    #2 KC
    #3 Hou
    #4 Pitt
    #5 SD
    #6 Ravens

    As far as the NFC I could do predictions but in the end it will be either the Rams or Saints.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. luuked

    luuked Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Messages:
    13,331
    Likes Received:
    4,521
    Ratings:
    +22,922
    I see no particular relevance in the past especially since every year teams change and evolve. If some historical trivia makes you feel better than good.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Thank You Thank You x 1
  9. QB12

    QB12 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,108
    Likes Received:
    165
    Ratings:
    +641
    Illogical now personal?
     
  10. luuked

    luuked Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Messages:
    13,331
    Likes Received:
    4,521
    Ratings:
    +22,922
    Nothing about this is illogical it is just one of those pointless historical stats that don't mean anything for a potential playoff matchup in 2018.

    Like I said if you feel better by holding onto results of completely different teams playing each other in the past then good for you. But this is not any more absurd than the people ****ting their pants because the Ravens beat us at some point more than 6 years ago.

    Hell as teams evolve I would not even think the results from the first 8 weeks of the regular season this year have much bearing on what will happen in the playoffs and those are significantly more relevant than what happened in the years before.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  11. QuantumMechanic

    QuantumMechanic Burn it all down! PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    2,291
    Ratings:
    +12,975
    Hell, look at 2007 Week 17 and SB42.
     
  12. 1960Pats

    1960Pats PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,128
    Likes Received:
    2,483
    Ratings:
    +9,258
    Upon further review...
    I have KC and Tenn winning out
    NE, Hou, Pitt, LC and Denver losing 1 more
    Balt and Miami losing 2 more
    Indy losing 3 more

    That leaves...
    1 - KC (14-2)
    2 - NE (12-4)
    3 - Hou (12-4)
    4 - Pitt (10-5-1)
    5 - LAC (12-4)
    6 - Ten (10-6)
    Bal, Ind, Den at 9-7
    Mia at 8-8

    This will set up rematches with Ten at Hou and LAC at Pitt (because of the ridiculous division setup and in spite of the Chargers better record and win over Pitt, this game will be a home game for Pitt). Houston and Pitt will go on to win.

    That leaves Pitt at KC and Hou at NE, with both home teams winning, resulting in a NE at KC title game in the AFC.

    Some games may end up being meaningless and change things...
    Hou vs Phi, LAC at Den and Ind at Tenn for instance.
     
  13. goheels22002

    goheels22002 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    7,612
    Likes Received:
    1,618
    Ratings:
    +6,580
    I think Baltimore is going to beat the Chiefs.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. supafly

    supafly PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    29,000
    Likes Received:
    4,008
    Ratings:
    +18,429
    True, but if anyone walked away from the week 17 matchup feeling super confident, they were kidding themselves. The Giants played very well and were leading that game in the third quarter. As a matter of fact, the Pats were down 28-16 at one point and had to score 15 points in the final quarter.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  15. supafly

    supafly PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    29,000
    Likes Received:
    4,008
    Ratings:
    +18,429
    If the Ravens actually pull that off, we’ll know that they’re capable of winning a big game. In the meantime, they really haven’t beaten anyone worthy aside from Pittsburgh.
     
  16. maust1013

    maust1013 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Messages:
    2,642
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Ratings:
    +5,571
    And of late there may be some doubt about just how 'worthy' Pittsburgh is
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. TB_Helmet

    TB_Helmet In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    984
    Ratings:
    +5,284
    Agreed...that’s just how sports works.
     
  18. TheBostonStraggler

    TheBostonStraggler Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    May 21, 2006
    Messages:
    5,748
    Likes Received:
    1,379
    Ratings:
    +5,420
    that's my take on it too Sup. Obviously some of this is 20/20 hindsight but that game was the expose of some weaknesses not fully seen before (some injury caused). And that was a struggle end to end to get the W.

    I see why some say this year has nothing to do with the last. There isn't an utter lack of logic in that belief. But same QB and same coach with a totally dominating AFCE record except in Miami (with different QBs and coaches in that span) over a pretty significant sample? I just don't see how that doesn't have a bit of prognostication value (if I'm putting money on the game there is no way I'd dismiss out of hand the abnormal loss rate in Miami).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. QuantumMechanic

    QuantumMechanic Burn it all down! PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    2,291
    Ratings:
    +12,975
    Right, but in Week 17 NE had no problems scoring points. Rather different in SB42.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. supafly

    supafly PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    29,000
    Likes Received:
    4,008
    Ratings:
    +18,429
    I guess, QM, but they were bottled up pretty well when they were held to 16 halfway through the third quarter, so I think there were some hints of things to come, that’s all.

    At any rate your point is quite valid. I just don’t love the example of that particular game.
     

Share This Page

Search For Links: - CLOSE
For searches with multiple players
add commas (Ex: "Brady, Gronkowski")