luuked
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 20,259
- Reaction score
- 37,772
Baltimore could give them a little trouble too.
I just don't see L. Jackson being able to score enough on KC. But yeah might be another long shot. Sure.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Baltimore could give them a little trouble too.
I don't know if the Colts will beat Houston but I'm calling now that Philly beats them.
Not sure if this has any relevance for a potential matchup really.
Oh, so that a potential opposing QB has never beat a Brady-Belichick team has NO relevance? smh
Oh, so that a potential opposing QB has never beat a Brady-Belichick team has NO relevance? smh
I see no particular relevance in the past especially since every year teams change and evolve. If some historical trivia makes you feel better than good.
Illogical now personal?
Hell, look at 2007 Week 17 and SB42.Hell as teams evolve I would not even think the results from the first 8 weeks of the regular season this year have much bearing on what will happen in the playoffs and those are significantly more relevant than what happened in the years before.
Baltimore could give them a little trouble too.
True, but if anyone walked away from the week 17 matchup feeling super confident, they were kidding themselves. The Giants played very well and were leading that game in the third quarter. As a matter of fact, the Pats were down 28-16 at one point and had to score 15 points in the final quarter.Hell, look at 2007 Week 17 and SB42.
If the Ravens actually pull that off, we’ll know that they’re capable of winning a big game. In the meantime, they really haven’t beaten anyone worthy aside from Pittsburgh.I think Baltimore is going to beat the Chiefs.
If the Ravens actually pull that off, we’ll know that they’re capable of winning a big game. In the meantime, they really haven’t beaten anyone worthy aside from Pittsburgh.
I see no particular relevance in the past especially since every year teams change and evolve. If some historical trivia makes you feel better than good.
True, but if anyone walked away from the week 17 matchup feeling super confident, they were kidding themselves. The Giants played very well and were leading that game in the third quarter. As a matter of fact, the Pats were down 28-16 at one point and had to score 15 points in the final quarter.
Right, but in Week 17 NE had no problems scoring points. Rather different in SB42.True, but if anyone walked away from the week 17 matchup feeling super confident, they were kidding themselves. The Giants played very well and were leading that game in the third quarter. As a matter of fact, the Pats were down 28-16 at one point and had to score 15 points in the final quarter.
I guess, QM, but they were bottled up pretty well when they were held to 16 halfway through the third quarter, so I think there were some hints of things to come, that’s all.Right, but in Week 17 NE had no problems scoring points. Rather different in SB42.