I have not looked at any Cleveland Browns tape from the last few years, but does AVP utilize different spacing when he has a strong armed QB as opposed to JB? I also have a problem with some of his play designs but am willing to see how it plays out before I jump on the fire AVP train.
Against the Texans AVP put used gun more than he did with JB because Maye is seemingly more comfy in the gun. That makes me think that AVP is willing to adapt to his QB but now can he spread the defense horizontally? I do agree with Booty (yes that is how I am spelling it), the offense is not aggressive, but the was 5 weeks of JB and Maye can unlock more aggression so I am hopeful for AVP.
Initial question. When I said I did not watch Browns tape, but does AVP utilize different spacing with a stronger armed QB. I will accept that it could have been interpreted as me asking if the Browns offense could answer that question because without a doubt it was AVP that designed all of the plays with no input from Stefanski, the man that called the plays. I also understand that you don't know me and had to assume that I thought AVP called plays despite that it has been discussed numerous times on this forum that AVP is a first time play caller.
I never said AVP designed plays in Cleveland, but did mention that I have a problem with some of his designs. That was meant to mean here in New England and I am sorry that you didn't make that jump. I assumed when I said let it play out before I jump on the fire AVP train that it was clear I meant here.
Stephanski ran the offense in Cleveland.
Your response
Stefanski called plays, but AVP was involved in play design. Maybe it was more Stefanski though
My response that clearly said involved
No it was Stephanskis offense. AVP did the tasks of an OC (like running practice and meetings) but Stephansky designed the offense, made the personnel decisions and called the plays.
Why in the world would stephansky have AVP create a playbook for stephansky to call plays from?
Your response that assumed me saying involved meant create.
The fact that you are spelling his name incorrectly is losing credibility j/k. Like I said AVP was involved, didn't say he created them all but did say involved maybe as a sounding board.
My response
You didn’t say he was a sounding board, you said he designed the plays.
Yes, he was employed and was delegated some work. He wasn’t making decisions about the scheme, or the personnel, he was coaching what was given to him to coach.
That’s not what a real coordinator does.
Your response saying that I didn't say sounding board(its right there above)
I said involved and if a person acts a sounding board that is in fact involved. Opinions given and suggestions offered is involved.
I forgot what my original question was. Damn sometimes you just like to argue. **** man
my response reiterating that I said he was involved and then gave examples of different ways a person could be involved
You keep changing your claim. Of course I argue when you say he drained the plays and I say he didn’t and you say he must have been a sounding board so that’s the same thing.
You have yet to acknowledge what you said that disagreed with is wrong.
Your response telling me I changed my claim. You also told me you argue when I said AVP designed plays (Which I didn't say and you assumed. I will acknowledge that we have had a misunderstanding.
I will ask again, Since Stefanski and AVP have similar outlooks on the west coast offense and there is some overlap based on old Viking, Browns and our tape. Does the Browns offense utilize different spacing with a stronger armed QB?
Sorry that I seemed to cause quite the spat.
And yes I am quite an ******* but I thought this exercise was kinda fun