PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Mac Jones Injury Video [UPDATE - X-Rays were negative]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I appreciate the answer, but... It doesnt sell it for me. First of all, your second video is unavailable to me (must be country reason, but idk)

But if I take your first video, using the Glance as an example, there are 5 samplesright? 4 passes (1, 2, 3, 5), 1 run (4).

I do not like the fact that the decision-making process goes through ONE route, being the Glance:
1st - it's simplistic. I like it simplicity, but to have it being 1/3rd of your chances for a first down based on a momentanous QB read? I think it makes way more sense when you have an un-even playing field (which is my opinion on college football, although Ill be the first to say that Im dumb in this aspect...) and you know you have the better pieces.

Like, in the NFL, how many OLBs would simply... stay put, or have the jumping ability or the awareness to not get fooled by the RPO and simply delay their action a fraction? if the opponent is a RPO heavy team, they will be coached to expect these... These small advantage, localized in ONE area (in this case, the Glance Route) are, to me, gold's fooly in a uber athletic, competitive playing field. And these guys, especially a good one, or a good coach, will have safeguards to defend the run/pass...

Just to be clear, Im not trying to change your mind or anything, but I think the opportunity cost is just not there for RPO's.... you can blame microeconomics for this one: I'd rather have the full team focused on doing ALL routes/blocking/ whatever for one specific play making sure everyone has a chance to "become open", then risking all players "knowing" the best course of action based on ONE read that only the QB and the WR do (basically)

I have more to say about your first paragraph (ok, one route is the hot route, but aren't you relying on the others to be good "long term" developers if your run option is a no-go and your primary is unobtainable?). Im liking this discussion, so I hope I was understandable. If there is anything I wasnt too clear, let me know
For the second video, it makes me click on the link to go to Youtube rather than watching it embedded on this site. I think some issue with official NFL content. But maybe it's restricted in your country.

You're of course entitled to like/dislike a play concept, but there are some valid rebuttals to the points you raised.

First, to lay out how RPO's generally work, the OL/TE's all block the run play. They execute the full play assuming it's a run play, and the QB has the option to pull the ball and throw it. OL doesn't pass set- they do whatever they would do on the called run play (say inside zone, for a common RPO call). It's strictly less simplistic than any run play. Rather than only having the option to hand off, you have the option to hand off that same run play OR to pull and throw. So if you oppose it due to simplicity, you oppose almost all run plays. So when you bring up the micro/macro issue and say you'd rather have the whole team focus on ALL routes/blocking or whatever, they're still doing that. The OL are all still running a full run play. RPO's are, by definition, less limiting than a typical run play.

There can also be multiple route options. You can have the glance on the left side and a slant/bubble combo on the right side. That's fairly common as well. So not limited to just one route the QB can throw.

The read of the LB/SS in terms of whether to hand off or pull and throw isn't the only read being made in the play, too, of course. OL and RB still make their reads (read the fronts, read the blocks) like any normal run play.

The QB's decision flow of whether to hand it off or throw the glance route isn't less restricted than plenty of passing concepts. You put one defender in conflict and choose the more open between the two offensive players stressing that defender. This is similar to reading a defender on a high low concept in the passing game, which I'm sure you wouldn't oppose. But in this case instead of choosing between, say, the dig and the drag, you choose between the Izone handoff and the glance route.

Yes, defenses will know it's coming, but it's really hard to stop. It does put the defender in conflict. Same way defenses know that offenses run play actions, yet linebackers still bite and fill run gaps, leaving their zones open. You have often have to commit to trying to stop one action, which exposes the other action. If you just kind of play in between or try to bait one of them, you may leave both open (or the QB may read you well). They're also designed to make it hard to do that. The field is stretched out so you can't be in two places at once.

It works well in the NFL. Plenty of teams run it. Teams with great QBs (the Bills with Allen, the Chiefs with Mahomes), teams with solid QBs (the 2017 Eagles with Wentz), and teams with limited QBs (the 2021 Dolphins with Tua).
 
McAfee was right when they ridiculed the Boston media this morning.

Pardon my French, but just who the **** gives a ****ing sh!t what the **** that ****ing ignorant ****ing redneck with his ****ing wife-beater ****ing tee-shirt has to ****ing say about ANY ****ING THING?

**** Pat McAfee too.
 
Pardon my French, but just who the **** gives a ****ing sh!t what the **** that ****ing ignorant ****ing redneck with his ****ing wife-beater ****ing tee-shirt has to ****ing say about ANY ****ING THING?

**** Pat McAfee too.

Wow... I've seen you drop some pretty liberal f-bombs, but this might break your record! And in a weird combination of hating Pat McAffee in defense of the Boston sports media. Feels a tad excessive, but hey, let it out man!
 
Pardon my French, but just who the **** gives a ****ing sh!t what the **** that ****ing ignorant ****ing redneck with his ****ing wife-beater ****ing tee-shirt has to ****ing say about ANY ****ING THING?

**** Pat McAfee too.

I was going to buy you a devon godchaux jersey but now im thinking pat mcafee
 
Wow... I've seen you drop some pretty liberal f-bombs, but this might break your record! And in a weird combination of hating Pat McAffee in defense of the Boston sports media. Feels a tad excessive, but hey, let it out man!
These are a ton of media burner accounts on this page. Used to drive up ratings. I'd feel dirty engaged in that kind of business, that's why I'm a contract hitman
 
Last edited:
What's a PRP injection?
because I didn't know either ......

What is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and what are PRP injections?​

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy uses injections of a concentration of a patient’s own platelets to accelerate the healing of injured tendons, ligaments, muscles and joints. In this way, PRP injections use each individual patient's own healing system to improve musculoskeletal problems.

PRP injections are prepared by taking anywhere from one to a few tubes of your own blood and running it through a centrifuge to concentrate the platelets. These activated platelets are then injected directly into your injured or diseased body tissue. This releases growth factors that stimulate and increase the number of reparative cells your body produces.

Sounds like blood doping, hey it worked for Lance Armstrong
 
Pardon my French, but just who the **** gives a ****ing sh!t what the **** that ****ing ignorant ****ing redneck with his ****ing wife-beater ****ing tee-shirt has to ****ing say about ANY ****ING THING?

**** Pat McAfee too.
Don't hold back Captain, tell us how you really feel
 
LaFleur completely fooled by Belichick's press conference act. He has no clue who they will face at QB.

He did manage to out-Belichick Belichick by pumping up the opponents QB (Hoyer).

 
LaFleur completely fooled by Belichick's press conference act. He has no clue who they will face at QB.

He did manage to out-Belichick Belichick by pumping up the opponents QB (Hoyer).

I am sure LaFleur is quaking in his boots at the thought of having to face Axel and his tremendous knowledge of Matt Patricia’s brilliant system
 
I am sure LaFleur is quaking in his boots at the thought of having to face Axel and his tremendous knowledge of Matt Patricia’s brilliant system
It's actually a brilliant move by Bill when you think about it. Keep a back-up QB with only 2 starts in the last 4 seasons so there's very little film on the guy and zero film with Patricia as OC. In fact, Axel has 7 seasons with the Pats with only 1 start. He's the best kept secret weapon in the league.

Chess vs chequers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Patriots Take a CB With Their First Pick on Day 3
Wolf Cites ‘Untapped Potential’ After Patriots Select Notre Dame Tight End Raridon
Patriots Trade-Up Landed Them a Defensive Menace in Jacas
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Night Two Press Conference 4/24
MORSE: Patriots Don’t Sit Back, Team Trades up to Get Their Guy
TRANSCRIPT: Caleb Lomu’s Interview with New England media 4/23
MORSE: Patriots Make a Questionable Selection of Caleb Lomu in the First Round
Patriots Trade Up, Take Utah Tackle in Round 1 of the NFL Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 4/23
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Press Conference 4/23
Back
Top