ashley
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,926
- Reaction score
- 33,922
We have bigger plans than Teddy.Patriots could not give a 6th round pick for Bridgewater?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.We have bigger plans than Teddy.Patriots could not give a 6th round pick for Bridgewater?
Darnold is not a viable starter. Carolina is picking 8th. Right now with no trades, they are in line to get the 4th QB off the board. They also are high enough where they can trade the least to get Atlanta’s pick if they feel pressure.
Darnold is not a viable starter. Carolina is picking 8th. Right now with no trades, they are in line to get the 4th QB off the board. They also are high enough where they can trade the least to get Atlanta’s pick if they feel pressure.
Yep, just like having Cam doesn't mean we have the long term answer.Yup. All this says is that Denver and Carolina are in flux at QB and are trying to create movement at the position to find something that works
Nope, they said they were going to, but:Apropos of something. They took up his 5th year option.
Why waste valuable picks on him then? Your argument makes no sense
Yet in the end BB typically does something more mystifying than intriguing, and usually disappointing for those who think like fantasy football players.All this pre-draft maneuvering is making this the most intriguing NFL draft in many, many years.
No shot Falcons trade back to a division rival to help them get a player while potentially missing out on the #1 player on their board.Darnold is not a viable starter. Carolina is picking 8th. Right now with no trades, they are in line to get the 4th QB off the board. They also are high enough where they can trade the least to get Atlanta’s pick if they feel pressure.
Actually, I think they’d both still take QBs. Bridgewater is damaged goods and a back-up at best. Darnold is a reclamation project. If Lance, Jones, and/or Fields fall, I can very easily see those two teams still being players. The draft is deep with tackles and WRs. Not so much at QB after the first round.Denver is still in the mix. Teddy is a backup for a 6th rounder, not a starter.
Carolina has Darnold. I don't think they take a QB.
Yet in the end BB typically does something more mystifying than intriguing, and usually disappointing for those who think like fantasy football players.
I smell a lot of optimism bias on this board in general and this thread in particular.
Keep in mind this is how our last five first rounds went down:
We would have to get to 4 or 7 for one of the top 5 QBsActually, I think they’d both still take QBs. Bridgewater is damaged goods and a back-up at best. Darnold is a reclamation project. If Lance, Jones, and/or Fields fall, I can very easily see those two teams still being players. The draft is deep with tackles and WRs. Not so much at QB after the first round.
Excellent point about trading within the division, it's not going to happen....It seems the closer we get to the draft, the more likely Atlanta will not trade out of 4 and will make Pitts their selection.No shot Falcons trade back to a division rival to help them get a player while potentially missing out on the #1 player on their board.
Sounds like we’re trying to trade up to 4 if you believe the reports.We would have to get to 4 or 7 for one of the top 5 QBs
Chris, I think we can forget about trading up to 4, we'd have to give up too much and from all accounts, Atlanta is now more inclined to make that selection(most likely Pitts)We would have to get to 4 or 7 for one of the top 5 QBs
Definitely an intriguing situation, all I'm saying is be prepared at some level for disappointment, it's more likely than not. So many teams can honestly say they need to improve at QB. If we were serious about taking a different tact, I think we would have made the kind of move SF did in the same time frame they did, now we're in the "sloppy seconds" category. The realities of supply and demand say we're going to need a massive amount of luck to get a quality QB starter given the current situation.True, but this is the first time in twenty years that Bill is coming off a losing season.
It is also the first time in that same time span where there is such a glaring need at quarterback (even if he never acknowledges that fact publicly).
That does put a different complexion on things.Nope, they said they were going to, but:
Yet in the end BB typically does something more mystifying than intriguing, and usually disappointing for those who think like fantasy football players.
I smell a lot of optimism bias on this board in general and this thread in particular.
Keep in mind this is how our last five first rounds went down:
| 7 | 644 |
| 64 | 7K |
| 5 | 1K |
| 0 | 600 |
| 1K | 31K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 8 - April 23 (Through 26yrs)











