50-yard-line
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
- Messages
- 8,925
- Reaction score
- 13,070
Mhm, sure, that's why they leaped to three instead of 4 or 5.Lynch is just a figurehead. Kyle calls the shots.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Mhm, sure, that's why they leaped to three instead of 4 or 5.Lynch is just a figurehead. Kyle calls the shots.
"I feel good about 5 guys at 3." After the biggest overpay ever to get to that spot?Lynch setting up KS to take the fall?
View attachment 32360
If that’s the case, and they do trade him, they should have dealt him before the trade deadline last year. Might have resulted in a couple of more losses while experimenting with Jackson in the CB1 role, and improved draft position in each round. But whatever. I’d rather not part with Gilmore but if it can help get us our QB, then I’m fine with it.Wow, I never thought it was an absolute certainty that Gilmore would not be traded until I read this.
I don't believe Russini. You can bet against her. WHich is why Gilmore will not be traded.If that’s the case, and they do trade him, they should have dealt him before the trade deadline last year. Might have resulted in a couple of more losses while experimenting with Jackson in the CB1 role, and improved draft position in each round. But whatever. I’d rather not part with Gilmore but if it can help get us our QB, then I’m fine with it.
Wow, I never thought it was an absolute certainty that Gilmore would not be traded until I read this.
Yep plus the extra $$ and the 3rd comp pick if they let Thuney walk last year.If that’s the case, and they do trade him, they should have dealt him before the trade deadline last year. Might have resulted in a couple of more losses while experimenting with Jackson in the CB1 role, and improved draft position in each round. But whatever. I’d rather not part with Gilmore but if it can help get us our QB, then I’m fine with it.
Trading Gilmore leaves a big hole at the corner position. Not sure if I trust Jackson as a number 1, great 2 though.
Agreed, we would most likely take a cb in the 2nd round, in bb fashion!Giving up Gilmore and the 15 pick would leave a glaring hole at the corner position. Jackson isn’t a true 1.
That is an interesting takewondering if gilmore gets traded. Wonder if sherman goes to new england. He said he was waiting intill after the draft.
This trade only makes sense if they are sure they are getting a franchise QB.Giving up Gilmore and the 15 pick would leave a glaring hole at the corner position. Jackson isn’t a true 1.
If indeed Gilmore is traded there need to jump on Sherm, downgrade for sure but still a good player.wondering if gilmore gets traded. Wonder if sherman goes to new england. He said he was waiting intill after the draft.