- Joined
- Apr 24, 2015
- Messages
- 17,539
- Reaction score
- 41,067
I'm sorry but there's too much stupid on this board. Nothing wrong w calling someone out on it.
Sure but you don't have to be a dink about it.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm sorry but there's too much stupid on this board. Nothing wrong w calling someone out on it.
lol I ain't mad pounding my fingers in the keyboard but It is what it is though. Why cant I call stupid, stupid? And again was I wrong, no. Put me on ignore if I hurt your feelings?
lol I ain't mad pounding my fingers in the keyboard but It is what it is though. Why cant I call stupid, stupid? And again was I wrong, no. Put me on ignore if I hurt your feelings?
Brady might be here longer than Sony. It's ludicrous to think Sony is a "transition" RB to the next guy.
Reading is fundamental, what was said is "IMO Sony Michel was drafted to aid in the transition from Brady to QB yet to be named", by bolstering the ground game it would ease the stress on whoever replaces #12..." no one spoke about a "transition" RB.. just your imagination.
Need to pay attention to the rules, this is about opinions, not necessarily about right and wrong and if there is a differing opinion that should be respected...
The tone might have rough but his point is valid. Michel is a one contract proposition and not someone who will help bridge anything past Brady. He has been selected to have an impact NOW (next 2-3 years) while Brady is still here.
Bro you opened the door now walk through it. Please go through my history & it pull up? If not. STFU.
Off the top of my head on offense - Brady, Edelman, Gronk, and Cannon. I have a lingering feeling that I’m missing someone though. But yes, if Michel is already needing his knee drained, the prospects don’t look good for a second contract from where we sit today.The list of Pats' draftees under BB who have gotten second contracts with the Pats isn't particularly long to begin with. Mostly OL and defense, I'd guess.
Off the top of my head on offense - Brady, Edelman, Gronk, and Cannon. I have a lingering feeling that I’m missing someone though. But yes, if Michel is already needing his knee drained, the prospects don’t look good for a second contract from where we sit today.
Solder, Light, Mankins, Andrews, Ahern, White ... White is the only RB, IIRC. Bolden got a 2nd contract as a special-teamer.
Ok - each of you settle down - let's not go down this road and let's just move on.Bro you opened the door now walk through it. Please go through my history & it pull up? If not. STFU.
Exactly!! Use a 1st round pick, which are rare for the Patriots in recent years, on a guy who has a history of knee issues and hurts himself on a non-contact play in practice. Not good.So to me the concern is less about how he’ll recover from this injury. My main concern is more about whether or not these injuries will continue to be a trend for him.
Exactly!! Use a 1st round pick, which are rare for the Patriots in recent years, on a guy who has a history of knee issues and hurts himself on a non-contact play in practice. Not good.
Except that one wight will help save Westeros while all 3 dragons are most likely dead by series end.
level 1
BaconGrundleCandy
I disagree abt "The Trade" if u will.
It was awful and very graphic seeing V die but I think we can see the endgame coming and balance has to be restored. There's a good chance that all 3 dragons will die by series end.
That wight might just save Westeros in convincing the people who don't have dragons, **** their siblings or deliver shadow babies.
Word will undoubtedly get out and as winter nears opinions will no doubt change.
always right about all things across all platforms....you're right (of course).This site is beneath your prodigious intelligence. Feel free to leave and don't come back.
For me, a good start would be playing in the majority of games without any major injuries, looking good in pass protection, and not putting the ball on the ground.What are the expectations for this guy? Put another way, what is the minimum he would have to do in terms of either rush yards or total yards to have people say "this guy seems like a good pick at this time.
Obviously for a first rounder the expectation is more than 1 year of production, but what would a good start look like?
| 31 | 2K |
| 10 | 1K |
| 40 | 2K |
| 14 | 354 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 28 - June 12 (Through 26yrs)











