- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 16,482
- Reaction score
- 1,343
You called in week one that Sudfeld would suck?
That thread I posted last week was saying he had no reason to be on this active roster... I have no idea what you are talking about?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You called in week one that Sudfeld would suck?
I dont think he is going to make it to the practice squad......If he does ..it would be a miracle....btw ..this is a sign....Gronk is playing.....!!!
That thread I posted last week was saying he had no reason to be on this active roster... I have no idea what you are talking about?
I know Sudfeld has struggled a lot, but I still think this is a bad move. Wasn't Sudfeld injured prior to the last preseason game, then got re injured week 1 of the regular season ? The guy was obviously trying to play injured. You don't go from stud to dud in 3 weeks. The guy has so much potential, great size, sure he didn't show the hands he showed in the preseason, but hell, neither did Thompkins in week 2 against the Jets (he looked terrible), we didn't cut him (thank goodness). I really think this comes back to haunt us like Woodhead did to the Jets. I bet the Jets will be all over Sudfeld. Makes no sense. Throwing away a very good prospect. Especially since we have no TEs as it is.
Now, at the risk of beating to death an already hackneyed phrase, Bequette's a guy who really DOES have pictures...Phew!
As long as Jake Bequette is still on the roster, we're fine!
I know Sudfeld has struggled a lot, but I still think this is a bad move. Wasn't Sudfeld injured prior to the last preseason game, then got re injured week 1 of the regular season ? The guy was obviously trying to play injured. You don't go from stud to dud in 3 weeks. The guy has so much potential, great size, sure he didn't show the hands he showed in the preseason, but hell, neither did Thompkins in week 2 against the Jets (he looked terrible), we didn't cut him (thank goodness). I really think this comes back to haunt us like Woodhead did to the Jets. I bet the Jets will be all over Sudfeld. Makes no sense. Throwing away a very good prospect. Especially since we have no TEs as it is.
You posted that thread this week, after Zach had been struggling and had a tenuous grip on his roster spot. Hardly something to champion "calling."
If he returns to the PS, it could be reasonable assumed that NE made the switch more due to injury than anything else.
Mulligan clearly slipped my mind. Until he screws up blocking or catching, he just may be around awhile. He can always be used to irk Jet fans. :bricks:
Brady has targeted Sudfeld twice this season.
Brady has thrown two interceptions this season.
Sudfeld was unable to secure on easy onside kick.
Sudfeld: three targets, three turnovers. I know he's a developing rookie, but enough is enough. The game is clearly too big for him.
I called that Vince Wilfork would go on IR yesterday. Man, I am on fire.
Last player to wear #44 that was any good was RB John Stephens in the late 90s...I liked that guy.
That was FAR from an easy onside kick. Lay-off the haterade.
OH, and blaming the 2 interceptions on Sudfeld would be like blaming Solder for the Wendell letting Brady get sacked..
Heath Evans was a good player for the Pats... just sayin..
I called that Vince Wilfork would go on IR yesterday. Man, I am on fire.
He's a 24 year old UDFA rookie who gets hurt a lot. He can't block worth a damn, and he had his head up his ass when it came to route running and catching the ball. If he somehow becomes an ironman who blocks like a stud and catches everything thrown his way by Jacksonville QBs, so be it. At some point you have to be willing to let a player go when he's not getting it done.
Now, if only someone here could sneak into Bequette's house and find whatever embarrassing photos he has of BB....