Dexter
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2013
- Messages
- 795
- Reaction score
- 1,642
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.lmfao at the people who can't wait to hate on Rex.
Patriots QB Tom Brady was added to the team’s injury report. He was limited due to a knee issue.
I'd take Gronk even when he's hobbled because he's a top 3 blocking tight end. If I needed a receiver, there's a lot of receivers I'd take over Kelce.Gronk is definitely not what he once was but when he’s not hurt, I still pick him over that no block throwing Kelce
I wont be surprised if they wont blow them out. Its a week to week league.The Jets just lost 41-10 . . . at home . . . to a 2-7 team starting their 4th QB who they picked up about a week or so before the game.
I will be very disappointed if the Patriots can't blow them out.
I just realized what a dumb stat SoS and SoV is. Of course we have the best SoV, we beat the good teams and lost to 3 mediocre teams. Had we beat those 3 teams, our SoV would be down. And once we play the rats and bills more. our SoS will go down. Ridiculously dumb stat that opposing fans complain every season about.
Not to mention we never get to play ourselves.
Who is saying the Pats's schedule is weak? Based on opponent winning % they are #1 in the AFC.I think that which teams you play definitely matters. It's one of the reasons I can't stand an unbalanced schedule between teams who make the playoffs based off of wins and losses.
As much as people want to belittle the Pats weak schedule, no team has had an easier time than the Texans. By the end of the season they could end up playing only 2 of their 16 games against teams with a winning record. And one of those teams lost their QB in the game.
Who is saying the Pats's schedule is weak? Based on opponent winning % they are #1 in the AFC.
It's all good. I thought I saw a graph somewhere earlier in this thread which showed the Pats #1 in opponent win %I didn't express myself accurately. I was thinking more of the talk about the weak AFCE. Even during the recent playoffs for Miami and Buffalo, the AFCE was like the Rodney Dangerfield of NYFL divisions, they got no respect.
Not including yesterday's results the Pats are 7th in the AFC in opponent's winning % ;
1 - Cincy (.580) 58-42-1
2 - Denver (.573) 59-44
3 - Clev (.566) 56-43-2
3 - Buff (.566) 56-43-2
5 - Balt (.557) 54-43-3
6 - Jax (.550) 55-45-1
7 - NE (.520) 52-48-1
Who is saying the Pats's schedule is weak? Based on opponent winning % they are #1 in the AFC.