Chris Stevenson
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2018
- Messages
- 2,162
- Reaction score
- 1,350
I hear that a lot - "McD calls this too much", or "McD doesn't call that often enough". The simple, practical reality is that McD is limited to calling the plays that the players he has available to him are best able to execute. Of what benefit would it be for McD to arbitrarily call plays that the guys he has available to him can't execute well enough to be sufficiently successful?
Not every potential pass-catcher who's available for a game is going to excel equally at running every type of route at every distance. The players who, in 2016, excelled at, and who contributed the most to, the middle-distance (10-15 yards) receptions that comprised about 75% of last season's passing attack were Edelman, Mitchell and Bennett, with some help from White and Amendola.
With Bennett gone in FA (replaced by Allen), and with Edelman and Mitchell suddenly out of the picture just before the start of the regular season, Amendola became THE middle-distance receiver with Hogan leaving his 2016 deeper routes to Cooks and attempting to supplement Amendola with more middle-distance routes (Hogan's catch rate dropped significantly, btw). And then, after the first half of the season, even Hogan was unavailable.
Meanwhile, the increase in short-distance (<10yards) receiving from RBs (including White) has been even greater than the increase in deep-range (15 yards +) receiving.
... because the players who have the skills to be consistently successful running the mid-range routes simply haven't been available, but those who are best at short range and long range HAVE been available. So, middle-distance receptions this season have comprised about 25% of the passing attack.
All true, but I also see Brady ignoring Allen and Dorsett like they have a disease and then everyone runs around claiming they aren't any good. Well, if he doesn't throw to them, how do we know?
Also, this is not the first time it's been a struggle breaking in new guys. This isn't splitting the atom here.
In all honesty, I got giddy on that screen pass to Gillislee vs the Jets and the early passes to Dorsett and Allen early in the Pitt game, but then they were never seen again. That's what we need more of, but then it disappears throughout the game for some mysterious reason, which IMO, is McDaniels getting too cute, thinking he needs to show something else as opposed to just continuing to do what's working. Not all of the time, but absolutely sometimes he's done this.
It's stuff like that, which is what I am talking about here. Ever notice, the other All Pro QBs don't have such an issue breaking in new receivers every year? Rodgers, Rivers, Brees, Stafford, Big Ben, etc...No problems.
Cooks comes here and he's "not that good" according to some. So, does that mean Brees is better than Brady? I don't think so.
Obviously, Brady wants the guys he prefers, but life isn't perfect and it's their job to figure out a Plan B that is workable.
The offense has sputtered without Hogan out there, no question about it.
Edelman? Of course it took a hit, but it's a good thing BB dealt for Cooks, too. Different skill sets, but I am always shocked when people claim Cooks isn't that good, when it's because Edelman has been THAT good this whole time.
It doesn't mean a loaded RB group, a HOF TE and Cooks, can be your only targets, though.
The more sustained commitments to the run have been good, but the offense was clearly more lethal last year in the red zone.
As I keep mentioning, they've made it through and I expect the real deal on Sat night.
The Pats are so loaded in the backfield, Gillislee can't even stay Active.
Hands down, Brady's best RB group since 2003 or 2004, and i would say it's more talented and deeper.












