- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 18,534
- Reaction score
- 17,910
I can't find it but yesterday there was a thread that had some NFC talk and the Giants were brought up.
Obviously the team brings up bad memories but i decided to give them a quick look this year and i noticed something interesting.
This 10-4 team is good all around defensively and offensively has been not good but okay (but can't run). However who beat them and why? I wanna focus on 2 loses particularly. Against GB and against Pitt.
Arguably the 2nd and 3rd best QBs in the NFL. The games ended with a score of GB 23-16 and Pitt 24-14 so both were fairly close games.
What did they do to win? Score when possible. Took away the run. Ran fairly effectively. Kept the turnover margin close (GB lost 2-1 Pitt went even 2-2), Didn't allow any huge plays over 30 yards.
I found it interesting as this team is now a dark horse to represent the NFC and looking at the formula these teams used to win I asked "could the Pats use it?"
The answer is clearly yes. Something to think about.
Obviously the team brings up bad memories but i decided to give them a quick look this year and i noticed something interesting.
This 10-4 team is good all around defensively and offensively has been not good but okay (but can't run). However who beat them and why? I wanna focus on 2 loses particularly. Against GB and against Pitt.
Arguably the 2nd and 3rd best QBs in the NFL. The games ended with a score of GB 23-16 and Pitt 24-14 so both were fairly close games.
What did they do to win? Score when possible. Took away the run. Ran fairly effectively. Kept the turnover margin close (GB lost 2-1 Pitt went even 2-2), Didn't allow any huge plays over 30 yards.
I found it interesting as this team is now a dark horse to represent the NFC and looking at the formula these teams used to win I asked "could the Pats use it?"
The answer is clearly yes. Something to think about.












