- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 14,292
- Reaction score
- 18,471
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This year, accurate. Historically, not really.
You'll find in years when the Chargers are a playoff team they are pulling in 90% capacity.
When they don't they are in the 80% range.
Regardless they are incredibly profitable.
They are the 28th biggest TV market next to Baltimore, RDU, KC, Indy and Nashville.
In the mid-late 2000s they hit 92-96% capacity
Please read what I have read and tell me where the cheap-ass Spanos family can't afford to kick in a few bucks for a new stadium.
2013 San Diego Chargers Statistics & Players | Pro-Football-Reference.com
2013 NFL Football Attendance - National Football League - ESPN
San Diego Chargers revenue 2001-2015 | Statistic
San Diego Chargers franchise value 2002-2016 | Statistic
Chargers worth $1.5B as profit soars
I think he was joking.I agree with you but TIF's increase your homeowners taxes while giving deals to people who can more afford them. The company I work for did it to build a new hospital and the 20 year deal is nearing it's end. My guess is there will be new talks to extend it.
Good for San Diego. They didn't let the league hold them up.
Shame on Spanos, NFL on Chargers: After 56 seasons, the San Diego Chargers are no more, according to many reports. Like the Rams before them, and with the Raiders right behind them, deep-pocketed owners and the league are leaving behind a loyal, passionate fan base to move to an unfamiliar locale all because a city was smart enough not to contribute more than nominally to a new stadium. Good luck, Dean Spanos, sharing the new Los Angeles stadium with the Rams and developing a fan base. See how that works out. And this is what happens when commissioner Roger Goodell is only worried about reaching his goal of $25 billion in revenue by 2027. God forbid the NFL took money out of its own pockets and stocked and fixed the G-4 stadium fund program so that it could assist these owners in building new stadiums. That would help the league in the long term too, but it might cause Goodell to miss his revenue goals. We wouldn’t want that to happen.
But sad for loyal San Diego fans...Good for San Diego. They didn't let the league hold them up.
God, I hate this guy.Roger Goodell chimes in with his honest, thoughtful, and accurate assessment of the situation. Via PFT:
“For more than a decade, the San Diego Chargers have worked diligently toward finding a local stadium solution, which all sides agreed was required. These efforts took on added intensity in the last two years. A year ago, NFL owners granted the Chargers an option to move to Los Angeles. Rather than immediately exercising that option, the team spent the past year continuing to work on finding a stadium solution in San Diego.
“The Chargers worked tirelessly this past year with local officials and community leaders on a ballot initiative that fell short on election day. That work – and the years of effort that preceded it – reflects our strongly held belief we always should do everything we can to keep a franchise in its community. That’s why we have a deliberate and thoughtful process for making these decisions.
“Relocation is painful for teams and communities. It is especially painful for fans, and the fans in San Diego have given the Chargers strong and loyal support for more than 50 years, which makes it even more disappointing that we could not solve the stadium issue. As difficult as the news is for Charger fans, I know Dean Spanos and his family did everything they could to try to find a viable solution in San Diego.”
Roger Goodell chimes in with his honest, thoughtful, and accurate assessment of the situation. Via PFT:
“For more than a decade, the San Diego Chargers have worked diligently toward finding a local stadium solution, which all sides agreed was required. These efforts took on added intensity in the last two years. A year ago, NFL owners granted the Chargers an option to move to Los Angeles. Rather than immediately exercising that option, the team spent the past year continuing to work on finding a stadium solution in San Diego.
“The Chargers worked tirelessly this past year with local officials and community leaders on a ballot initiative that fell short on election day. That work – and the years of effort that preceded it – reflects our strongly held belief we always should do everything we can to keep a franchise in its community. That’s why we have a deliberate and thoughtful process for making these decisions.
“Relocation is painful for teams and communities. It is especially painful for fans, and the fans in San Diego have given the Chargers strong and loyal support for more than 50 years, which makes it even more disappointing that we could not solve the stadium issue. As difficult as the news is for Charger fans, I know Dean Spanos and his family did everything they could to try to find a viable solution in San Diego.”
I don't get this. Didn't the Rams just move there and have lower ratings this season? I thought that it was either the Rams or San Diego were going to move, and since the Rams already did, that was it. This BS about getting someone else to pay for your stadium, at the expense of long-standing fan bases, is going to come back and bite the NFL in the arse. Aren't the Raiders also supposed to move to Las Vegas?
Listen up NFL - your ratings and your revenue are going down because you are pissing off your bread and butter - fans that have supported you and your franchises for years. In New England there is a concerted boycott, or at least NFL fatigue over the BS you pulled with Tom Brady that is not going away. St. Louis, San Diego and soon Oakland also have, or will have, a bad taste over you and your shenanigans. Your attempts to export the NFL to the world are failing - it's not catching on so big anywhere else, and home fans are pissed about losing home games for their teams. You refuse to hire full time refs and train them so that there is consistency in the way games are called.
You need to fix these problems rather than move teams around willy-nilly trying to come up with the best stadiums. That is only one small piece of the puzzle and you are failing big time.
Look at the logo. It's ugly. Looks like the Dodgers.
| 271 | 12K |
| 13 | 655 |
| 10 | 629 |
| 13 | 597 |
| 15 | 946 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)










