- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Messages
- 25,343
- Reaction score
- 10,206
The line sucks so bad he could have that many sacks in three gamesAlabama Mac will have more sacks than that.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The line sucks so bad he could have that many sacks in three gamesAlabama Mac will have more sacks than that.
Okay, what positive thing did you see out of the offense in the three preseason games?Has any one person said a positive word about the offense that makes any sense, or the Defense, or the coaching, or the ticket sales? Does the ****ter still work, Captain and your I Hate Bill Apostles? Is your Crawhammer BS getting old yet. How many triggers do you have? PP2, Patsfan 2, Borne Again? I love the idiot ID that is Realfan2 that can't put a full sentence together, yet has been caught by an honest person on this board for backtracking their own quotes.
I like this board Ian. It could be great. Let's hope it will be in the future.
Please provide a recent example of this happening
Thanks
Bama Mac sack - Good QB, but OL sucks.The line sucks so bad he could have that many sacks in three games
It's whatever the opposite of complimentary football is in team parlance. Uncomplimentary football? Unpropitious football?The concept of dealing with pressure applies, regardless of what string of player you’re playing with. It took almost half the season last year before their offensive line settled in. It’s absolutely relevant. The same can be said about anyone who wants to criticize Zappe entirely based on last night or based entirely on this preseason. It wouldn’t be fair given who he had in front of him. Albeit, it still wasn’t his best work.
I don't care, I can't stand it
I can't recall a more disjointed training camp during the BB era. Our Oline injuries seemd to hold us hostage to any possible flow, rythem and development. Anderson and Strange still MIA. After a month of camp I quite literally have no idea what we have on offense??
That's true. There's no need to put a proven player in an unnecessarily harmful position.I'm too lazy to do that, sorry.
But it's common sense that you don't play your best players much in preseason (example: Judon only played one quarter the entire preseason, IIRC). So it follows that whoever you put out there for an extended period of time, you don't consider them part of your long-term plan.
No, my friend, real genius is being a "fan" of something because it gives you something to incessantly ***** about. Being a "fan" because the product in question allows you to flood your brain with anger and stress and roar like a wounded lion...over entertainment.When I read a parenthetical personal attack, my guess is that the next line's not going to be a work of genius.
To your point about how the Patriots offense "obviously got down the field quite a bit," how many yards of total offense did they generate?
I'm narrowly tailoring my response, because you guys clearly have history on the thread that it's not my mission to know. I just got a tiny bit put off by the level of vitriol, and then put way the hell off when it was followed by this statement that the Patriots obviously got down the field quite a bit. They generated offensive yards in the 70s. That's why you didn't answer. Okay I am in another thing. I don't know the deep argument here. Carry on.No, my friend, real genius is being a "fan" of something because it gives you something to incessantly ***** about. Being a "fan" because the product in question allows you to flood your brain with anger and stress and roar like a wounded lion...over entertainment.
That is true genius. Felger & Mazz-level genius.
It doesn't matter if Grier is better (he could be), you don't grab a QB to be your backup with no reps in your system this close to the season, so it's a moot point.Sorry if someone already mentioned this but…is it fair to ask if Levis (released by Dal) is better than Zappe?
The Patriots offense was terrible last year, but they had tons of scoring opportunities, as shown by the number of field goals. They were in position, whether through turnover for Folk to be fifth in the league in FGs at 32. Folk doesn't kick 60-yarders, barely 50-yarders, which is why I responded to FCB (who is nothing but a Pat-hater) in the way I did. They were 17th in offense, which is middle of the pack, according to his post, which he highlighted by emphasizing the 32 Folks FGs.I'm narrowly tailoring my response, because you guys clearly have history on the thread that it's not my mission to know. I just got a tiny bit put off by the level of vitriol, and then put way the hell off when it was followed by this statement that the Patriots obviously got down the field quite a bit. They generated offensive yards in the 70s. That's why you didn't answer. Okay I am in another thing. I don't know the deep argument here. Carry on.
Were you around last year?
As I stated earlier, it was a weird pre-season, where we didn't see much of anything from players who would be starting.Okay, what positive thing did you see out of the offense in the three preseason games?
I'll hang up and listen.
I'd feel better if it had been a mute point.It doesn't matter if Grier is better (he could be), you don't grab a QB to be your backup with no reps in your system this close to the season, so it's a moot point.
Re Zappe: Phil Perry made a good point. This is the first time he has ever been asked to run a complex offense. He may be struggling picking up concepts and understanding reads that may come in time.
He didn’t have a complex offense in college. Last year Patricia dumbed down the offense last year to the point of stupidity and dumbed it down even more for Zappe...