Collins is doubtful for this gameIt does. Would be my 3rd key. I'm a little less worried with Chubbs out. I think the D has been better with Barmore taking more of Godchaux's snaps and Collins taking more of Bentley's snaps
SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This is where we gather to follow things on Game Day. Obviously, emotions tend to be high so if anyone gets a little crazy, the use of the “Mute” button is encouraged on anyone who may be annoying to you to control your experience and to allow the moderators to also enjoy the game.
At the same time, please take a deep breath before over-reacting for the sake of making this a pleasant experience for everyone.
Collins is doubtful for this gameIt does. Would be my 3rd key. I'm a little less worried with Chubbs out. I think the D has been better with Barmore taking more of Godchaux's snaps and Collins taking more of Bentley's snaps
Thanks for the lesson in statistics Mr. LeeYou do realize that means they were saying the other guy had a 5% chance of winning, right?
You'd have reason to be upset if they said 100%, otherwise, math is math.
So the Pats DL doesn't matter?
I might put LBs as third key. I expect the DL to absorb run blocking and stops to depend on the Pats’ LB corps to clean up. If they do that effectively I like the outlook.It does. Would be my 3rd key. I'm a little less worried with Chubbs out. I think the D has been better with Barmore taking more of Godchaux's snaps and Collins taking more of Bentley's snaps
I might put LBs as third key. I expect the DL to absorb run blocking and stops to depend on the Pats’ LB corps to clean up. If they do that effectively I like the outlook.
Agreed, losing Collins would hurt. I’m wondering if High will be assigned to spy whoever is the Browns’ RB, and trust the rest of the team to take care of the rest of their business.If Collins doesn't play then I'm more concerned. Hightower, Judon, Collins, Van Noy is a very solid group. Plus Philips and Dugger near the action.
Big break if he can play.
If Stevenson plays, that still gives them two physical, versatile runners who can play all three downs, plus JJ to give them breathers. I’d be much more concerned if both Harris and Stevenson were out.Really concerned about Mac's health this week as a mediocreIQ might want to pass 45 times this game, spread offense without adequate protection, which could be disaster with sackmaster Myles Garrett trying to hit Mac.
.
Garrett is trying to get into Jones’ head. Really a sign of respect and even concern. And the kid ain’t taking the bait. I think he is going to play well this week.
If Stevenson plays, that still gives them two physical, versatile runners who can play all three downs, plus JJ to give them breathers. I’d be much more concerned if both Harris and Stevenson were out.
Godchaux's snap counts have been quite consistent with the exception of the two Jets games, so I don't know what you're talking about here. He's also been playing very well of late, including being the hammer on every short-yardage situation, where the Pats have been great of late.It does. Would be my 3rd key. I'm a little less worried with Chubbs out. I think the D has been better with Barmore taking more of Godchaux's snaps and Collins taking more of Bentley's snaps
Correct, his defensive snap per game %Godchaux's snap counts have been quite consistent with the exception of the two Jets games, so I don't know what you're talking about here. He's also been playing very well of late, including being the hammer on every short-yardage situation, where the Pats have been great of late.
Garrett has a foot issue. Does not mean it will impact him a lot, but if he is not 100%, it would help.Really concerned about Mac's health this week as a mediocreIQ might want to pass 45 times this game, spread offense without adequate protection, which could be disaster with sackmaster Myles Garrett trying to hit Mac.
.
Godchaux's snap counts have been quite consistent with the exception of the two Jets games, so I don't know what you're talking about here. He's also been playing very well of late, including being the hammer on every short-yardage situation, where the Pats have been great of late.
Correct, his defensive snap per game %
67%
38% (jest)
60%
55%
51%
63%
40% (jest)
58%
59%
Godchaux's snap counts have been quite consistent with the exception of the two Jets games, so I don't know what you're talking about here. He's also been playing very well of late, including being the hammer on every short-yardage situation, where the Pats have been great of late.
God has been playing more B (as opposed to A) gap and Davis has been playing more. He has absolutely been playing better as opposed to earlier in the year. Takes time to settle in and get comfortable in the defense. Communication, technique, etc.Godchaux's snap counts have been quite consistent with the exception of the two Jets games, so I don't know what you're talking about here. He's also been playing very well of late, including being the hammer on every short-yardage situation, where the Pats have been great of late.