- Joined
- Apr 17, 2010
- Messages
- 4,340
- Reaction score
- 2,939
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Absolutely would've preferred GB... That much should be clear.Does anyone STILL think Seattle is the better team to face, or has everyone figured it out now?
Those types of teams are the scariest.Well...Seahawks it is. How the hell do you beat a team that turns over the ball 5 times against Aaron Rodgers, has a 0 QB rating in the first half, and their top corner plays with only one arm and still wins?
Dude is probably going to need Geico. Someone's going to slash his tires.Bostik seriously should never play another snap in the league. Don't feel bad for him at all - that was disgraceful.
I do feel bad for packers fans, though. Heartbreak of sports on full display.
You do that by having your D bail your team out and holding the opponent to field goals, and then getting a couple of TO itself.Well...Seahawks it is. How the hell do you beat a team that turns over the ball 5 times against Aaron Rodgers, has a 0 QB rating in the first half, and their top corner plays with only one arm and still wins?
I know....and people wanted Seattle to win.....if pats win easier matchup would have been GB no doubt....seattle looks in good shape to try and win 2 years in a row here..lets hope pats show a lot today and then in 2 weeks
Cue the death threats on twitter.......Dude is probably going to need Geico. Someone's going to slash his tires.
Wouldn't matter at all if GB hadn't *****ed out and gotten a couple first downs when they got the ball with 5 min left in the gameJason La Canfora @JasonLaCanfora 5m5 minutes ago
Those two early chipshot field goals for the Packers end up biting them in the backside. Scoreboard didn't reflect their 1st half dominance