- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 35,863
- Reaction score
- 29,653
Bad team Saints 34 - 0.The 29th ranked Washington defense. Lolololololol
Great call.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Bad team Saints 34 - 0.The 29th ranked Washington defense. Lolololololol
Are you saying the patriots are a good team so a bad team can’t beat them?Bad team Saints 34 - 0.
Great call.
I agree and remember how burnt out he looked, but I still feel like the execution of the split up wasn’t the best. The bandaid needed to be fully ripped off.Their marriage had run it's course. Tom looked burnt out in 2019 and the future was looking bleak. The roster had been deteriorating and it turned out Bill has made it worse each year since Tom's departure. In fact, it's going in the direction of Bobby Grier all over again.
Whether Tom wanted to stay or not/Bill not wanting to sign him for 2 years, him not returning was the right move for him.
Saints scored 13 in Houston and Houston has one of the least talented rosters. Look at their „weapons“ and their defense. Then an objective guy should realize how bad the pats areBad team Saints 34 - 0.
Great call.
OK, HOU has a terrible roster. ??? They are what they are 3-3 and 16th in Power Rankings. They are a playoff contender.Saints scored 13 in Houston and Houston has one of the least talented rosters. Look at their „weapons“ and their defense. Then an objective guy should realize how bad the pats are
You keep on posting this. The O/U on the Commanders was 6.5, lol. You proposed a suckers bet. No one would take that bet.There is only one truth here. You said Washington is good, I offered that if you take the bet, and they won more than 8 games I will never post here again. But if they win less than 9 you never post here again. You chickened out of that, but still keep saying the same stuff you don’t have the balls to stand behind.
Are you wrong or a coward?
Because they coach betterOK, HOU has a terrible roster. ??? They are what they are 3-3 and 16th in Power Rankings. They are a playoff contender.
You keep on posting this. The O/U on the Commanders was 6.5, lol. You proposed a suckers bet. No one would take that bet.
Face it Andy, you've been wrong on just about everything you've posted this season. Your thread is a disaster so you resort to calling ppl out for not taking a suckers bet.
I called this an Andy mental masturbation thread. I was right.
The Texans also have something to play for -- they are a team that is rough around the edges, but gaining momentum and confidence.Because they coach better
Last year they were what?
Now playing with a rookie qb
No, you claimed that the Pats could beat these 4 bad teams out of the next 6 games.Are you saying the patriots are a good team so a bad team can’t beat them?
Your backpedaling while entertaining does not work here anymore.There is only one truth here. You said Washington is good, I offered that if you take the bet, and they won more than 8 games I will never post here again. But if they win less than 9 you never post here again. You chickened out of that, but still keep saying the same stuff you don’t have the balls to stand behind.
Are you wrong or a coward?
"Weapunz"Saints scored 13 in Houston and Houston has one of the least talented rosters. Look at their „weapons“ and their defense. Then an objective guy should realize how bad the pats are
Someone who says they are a good team would take it.You keep on posting this. The O/U on the Commanders was 6.5, lol. You proposed a suckers bet. No one would take that bet.
Face it Andy, you've been wrong on just about everything you've posted this season. Your thread is a disaster so you resort to calling ppl out for not taking a suckers bet.
I called this an Andy mental masturbation thread. I was right.
Wrong. I laid out a scenario of where they would be if they won games against the weaker part of the schedule. I did not claim they would beat that I projected where they would be if they did.No, you claimed that the Pats could beat these 4 bad teams out of the next 6 games.
Then the Pats got shutout. Thus far you're 0 - 2 staring at 0 - 4.
Your backpedaling while entertaining does not work here anymore.
I did not make a thread about Washington.
I challenged him to stand behind his argument. He wilted. I made no prediction in this thread. Take some reading comprehension classes.The guy who is spectacularly wrong about every prediction wants someone else to self perma-ban for some stupid, low percentage over under outcome of an irrelevant team.
Someone who says they are a good team would take it.
If it’s a suckers bet then you have just proven he is wrong and knows it.
There was nothing wrong with this thread, it was a very accurate assessment of the opportunity the patriots had. They didn’t capitalize but it was certainly still there.
Houston is ranked 14th on offense and 9th on defense.Saints scored 13 in Houston and Houston has one of the least talented rosters. Look at their „weapons“ and their defense. Then an objective guy should realize how bad the pats are
Wrong. I laid out a scenario of where they would be if they won games against the weaker part of the schedule. I did not claim they would beat that I projected where they would be if they did.
You argued adamantly that Washington was a good team. As always the integrity of your argument is non-existent because to refuse to stand behind it.
It’s not my fault you can’t read.
We are not Beating that Colts Team they have some monsters at RB too. They can literally Run away with that game.Houston is ranked 14th on offense and 9th on defense.
CJ Stroud has thrown 1 INT.
There you go again, three of the 4 teams had a 6.5 O/U, so none of them were expected to be over .500 Only Saints had a 9.5 O/U.It’s not my fault you can’t read.
And who exactly is backpedaling saying Washington is a good team and not standing behind it.
I will expand the bet to all 4 of the teams I mentioned. Combined record over .500 you win and I disappear, under .500 I win and you disappear.
See this is opposite of backpedaling I am willing to stand behind my opinion. Since you are afraid to, it would appear it is you who are backpedaling. Checkmate.
| 286 | 10K |
| 122 | 5K |
| 270 | 9K |
| 1K | 56K |
| 271 | 12K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











