Next 6 games.

[Triumph]

We are not Beating that Colts Team they have some monsters at RB too. They can literally Run away with that game.

But Andy Ring6 Johnson says that Indy is no good.

And he knows about good RBs. Maroney was his favorite.

 

[PatsFan2]

But Andy Ring6 Johnson says that Indy is no good.

And he knows about good RBs. Maroney was his favorite.

Dancing with the stars.

 

[Ring 6]

There you go again, three of the 4 teams had a 6.5 O/U, so none of them were expected to be over .500 Only Saints had a 9.5 O/U.

A more honest bet, in line with the theme of your thread is to bet Pats <.500 you vanish, and >.500, he'll be gone. Pats had a preseason 7.5 O/U. It's a fairer bet. Back up the theme of your thread by putting your balls where your mouth is: bet Pats end >.500, then you can claim checkmate.

So you agree with me that they are bad teams. Case closed.

 

[Ring 6]

There you go again, three of the 4 teams had a 6.5 O/U, so none of them were expected to be over .500 Only Saints had a 9.5 O/U.

A more honest bet, in line with the theme of your thread is to bet Pats <.500 you vanish, and >.500, he'll be gone. Pats had a preseason 7.5 O/U. It's a fairer bet. Back up the theme of your thread by putting your balls where your mouth is: bet Pats end >.500, then you can claim checkmate.

No where in this thread did I say the patriots would finish over .500.

 

[Triumph]

It’s not my fault you can’t read.

And who exactly is backpedaling saying Washington is a good team and not standing behind it.
I will expand the bet to all 4 of the teams I mentioned. Combined record over .500 you win and I disappear, under .500 I win and you disappear.

See this is opposite of backpedaling I am willing to stand behind my opinion. Since you are afraid to, it would appear it is you who are backpedaling. Checkmate.

.

You tell so many lies and then spin like a top when caught that we need to review your latest BS.

Buffalo (h) and Miami (a) sandwiched in between 4 bad teams; NO, LV, Wash, Indy.

With winnable games with LA, Giants, jets, Pitt, Denver still to go, there is a lot of season left.

4 or 5 wins in those 6 games sets them up in decent shape to finish strong.

4 BAD TEAMS.

There is no way to lie your way out.

 

[Kontradiction]

No where in this thread did I say the patriots would finish over .500.

Not in this thread, but…

The schedule never turns out the way it looks before the season.
This is an excellent defense and the offense will be above average.
75% of the teams in the league are 7-11 win teams, depending upon turnovers and fluky wins and losses. If they protect the ball and take it away this is easily an 11 win team.

 

[Ring 6]

Not in this thread, but…

And it’s true. They haven’t done either.
That also isn’t a prediction it’s a caveat of what they must do in order to reach that level.

 

[Kontradiction]

And it’s true. They haven’t done either.
That also isn’t a prediction it’s a caveat of what they must do in order to reach that level.

So you don’t think we can stop those two things, with the GOAT HC leading the way, to win 8 more games the rest of the way?

 

[Ring 6]

.

You tell so many lies and then spin like a top when caught that we need to review your latest BS.



4 BAD TEAMS.

There is no way to lie your way out.

They are 4 bad teams. I never disputed that I said that and I don’t now.
I am wiling to stand behind that opinion. You are afraid to stand behind yours. Who is lying?

 

[Ring 6]

So you don’t think we can stop those two things, with the GOAT HC leading the way, to win 8 more games the rest of the way?

If they stop turning the ball over and start taking it away they will play at the level of an 11 win team. They haven’t done that. Discussing what is necessary in order to play at that level is not close to the same as predicting they will and that was clear.
It’s like if I said in May if the Red Sox get better pitching they will be a playoff team. They would have, and they didn’t.

 

[Kontradiction]

If they stop turning the ball over and start taking it away they will play at the level of an 11 win team. They haven’t done that. Discussing what is necessary in order to play at that level is not close to the same as predicting they will and that was clear.
It’s like if I said in May if the Red Sox get better pitching they will be a playoff team. They would have, and they didn’t.

So why not make that bet? You sound confident that we can win 8 of the next 11. BB has shown he can have his team clean up errors which, apparently, is the only thing stopping us from “playing like an 11-win team.”

Personally? I really don’t care either way. This thread has been fun reading. I’m not sure why one grown man would challenge another grown man to a “this town ain’t big enough for the both of us” leave-off contest over a hobby in which the only requirement is to sit on one’s ass and stare at the TV for a few hours every Sunday, but everyone is different, I guess. Do you not have any confidence that BB can clean up these errors to finish the season with 9 wins?

 

[StockingAnarchyNumber12]

If they stop turning the ball over and start taking it away they will play at the level of an 11 win team. They haven’t done that. Discussing what is necessary in order to play at that level is not close to the same as predicting they will and that was clear.
It’s like if I said in May if the Red Sox get better pitching they will be a playoff team. They would have, and they didn’t.

I don’t think this team is capable of playing good enough to pull out 11 wins and the 1-5 record is why I say that. This isn’t a good team and we are probably 0-6 if Rodgers isn’t injured. I won’t say we are the worst team in the league, but we are bottom 5.

 

[StockingAnarchyNumber12]

So why not make that bet? You sound confident that we can win 8 of the next 11. BB has shown he can have his team clean up errors which, apparently, is the only thing stopping us from “playing like an 11-win team.”

Personally? I really don’t care either way. This thread has been fun reading. I’m not sure why one grown man would challenge another grown man to a “this town ain’t big enough for the both of us” leave-off contest over a hobby in which the only requirement is to sit on one’s ass and stare at the TV for a few hours every Sunday, but everyone is different, I guess. Do you not have any confidence that BB can clean up these errors to finish the season with 9 wins?

I don’t even know if we will win 3 of the next 11. We are possibly 1-7 after the next couple games and should be 0-8 if Rodgers was playing.

 

[203Pat]

I love the doubling down on the fake confidence.

 

[Kontradiction]

I don’t even know if we will win 3 of the next 11. We are possibly 1-7 after the next couple games and should be 0-8 if Rodgers was playing.

Yeah, we are pretty ****ing terrible. Lmao.

 

[SVN]

I don’t think this team is capable of playing good enough to pull out 11 wins and the 1-5 record is why I say that. This isn’t a good team and we are probably 0-6 if Rodgers isn’t injured. I won’t say we are the worst team in the league, but we are bottom 5.

Remember what was being said of zach wilson after the pats trade. People dindt want him to take another snap. joe namath wanted him traded. it needs an attitude shift and playing with focus and purpose and they have turned it around inspite of zach. Our team has no fire or attitude. no one seems pissed or angry about anything . Post game too, its all "we will be alright. eed to work hard." not one person seems really pissed off. That is the difference. If they moderately cared and we didnt have this suddne injury bug then look at the schedule even if we are 1-7 -
WAS,IND,NYG,SD,PITT . These are games they could/would compete and be 6-7 entering chiefs week. Its not impossible. ITs just they have no leadership in the players to take some onus. And we have the injury bug at the crtiical places on the team.

 

[StockingAnarchyNumber12]

Remember what was being said of zach wilson after the pats trade. People dindt want him to take another snap. joe namath wanted him traded. it needs an attitude shift and playing with focus and purpose and they have turned it around inspite of zach. Our team has no fire or attitude. no one seems pissed or angry about anything . Post game too, its all "we will be alright. eed to work hard." not one person seems really pissed off. That is the difference. If they moderately cared and we didnt have this suddne injury bug then look at the schedule even if we are 1-7 -
WAS,IND,NYG,SD,PITT . These are games they could/would compete and be 6-7 entering chiefs week. Its not impossible. ITs just they have no leadership in the players to take some onus. And we have the injury bug at the crtiical places on the team.

I’d love it but I don’t see us being 6-7. If we end up 6-7 then watch out nfl because we have turned the corner

 

[SVN]

I’d love it but I don’t see us being 6-7. If we end up 6-7 then watch out nfl because we have turned the corner

i dont think we can even if play clean and fundamental football now because the injuries have piled up. but i want to see them play well . no tanking nonsense for me.

 

[venecol]

Remember what was being said of zach wilson after the pats trade. People dindt want him to take another snap. joe namath wanted him traded. it needs an attitude shift and playing with focus and purpose and they have turned it around inspite of zach. Our team has no fire or attitude. no one seems pissed or angry about anything . Post game too, its all "we will be alright. eed to work hard." not one person seems really pissed off. That is the difference. If they moderately cared and we didnt have this suddne injury bug then look at the schedule even if we are 1-7 -
WAS,IND,NYG,SD,PITT . These are games they could/would compete and be 6-7 entering chiefs week. Its not impossible. ITs just they have no leadership in the players to take some onus. And we have the injury bug at the crtiical places on the team.

Difference being the Jets are loaded with talent on both sides of the ball.

 

[Ring 6]

So why not make that bet? You sound confident that we can win 8 of the next 11. BB has shown he can have his team clean up errors which, apparently, is the only thing stopping us from “playing like an 11-win team.”

Personally? I really don’t care either way. This thread has been fun reading. I’m not sure why one grown man would challenge another grown man to a “this town ain’t big enough for the both of us” leave-off contest over a hobby in which the only requirement is to sit on one’s ass and stare at the TV for a few hours every Sunday, but everyone is different, I guess. Do you not have any confidence that BB can clean up these errors to finish the season with 9 wins?

First no one offered me that bet, and second I don’t have confidence there is a qb on the roster capable of eliminating turnovers and when your top 4 corners and best pass rusher are injured Im not sure how you can expect to be good at takeaways.

As far as your understanding of I don’t really care whether you understand or not, but any attempt I can make to remove a **** from the board, I will because it would improve the experience if he were not here.