Hey, you mentioned my "sports allegiances", not me. I just listed the team's I root for and then you guys kept commenting on it. I haven't brought up the Yanks before and won't in the future. Unless of course someone comments or asks about 'em.
You can attempt to knock them all you want though. That's just a fruitless endeavor. Kinda like me saying Brady isn't a very good QB. Aka, a comment not worth arguing about.
So you think there is a legitimate comparison between the Yankees' purchased dominance and Brady's excellence?
To paraphrase the old Smith Barney commercial, Brady did it the old-fashioned way, "He EARNED it", while the Yankees did it the old New York way, they bought it.
It has to be doubly frustrating to Rats fans to see, when the NY-centric NFL* front office types manufacture an offense against the Pats, and confiscate valuable resources from the Pats, to see them win two out of the next three Superbowls, and be the odds on favorite to win the next one.
Imagine if MLB instituted a salary cap and took away NY's unfair advantage...
Now, once again, which dynasty is better?
Your best argument might be that the Pats having Brady and BB is an unfair advantage, and that is closer to the truth, but while it is a gr8 advantage, it is certainly not an unfair one, in fact, it is what sports is supposed to be about.
Mano a mano, and let the superior performer triumph.