I would say the 'stache worked pretty good for these guys as well.
Prince, Santana, David Crosby, Dave Grohl, Lemmy, Ted Nugent, Jim Croce....
I'll take these in order -
To the earlier Beatles Sergeant Pepper period mustaches - The Beatles were already well established by then. That's a case of image tweaking in order not to not wear out the original mop top formula. They would never happened in the beginning had they showed up on the scene singing "She Loves You" with freaking mustaches. The chicks woulda stayed away in droves.
Same goes for the latter pics of Prince, Freddy Mercury, & Dave Grohl. All 3 of their mustaches are again, image variation after the original clean shaven look that had broken them big. None would've initially happened if they came through the record company door with a mustache.
And in Dave Grohl's case, that's not a mustache, per se. It's a hipster FAUX stache. If you're familiar with the term, it's a joke mustache worn by someone who normally wouldn't wear one. It's more of a "Hey, check my mustache out. Don'tcha think it's strange for someone with my personality to be sporting one?"
That's the deal behind Grohl's. His is more of the Hipster Fauxstache social statement.
And again, Nirvana wouldn't have happened if they had Mustaches. Grunge Goatees? Yes. Mustaches? No. And don't even think of bringing up Chris Cornell.
Google Kurt Cobain's "Mr. Mustache" song & comic strip and maybe you'll find out his opinion on mustaches.
And again, Groh's Foo Fighters wouldn't have happened without Nirvana. I shudder at even putting the two in the same sentence.
Lastly, you gave me pics of Zappa & Lemmy. Those have gotta be two of the ugliest males who ever made it in Rock. Zappa & Lemmy have mustaches to cover ther ugly faces. Know who listens to Zappa? Nerdy guys who can't get laid. And Motorhead? Uneducated lower class boltheads.
Both of them fall under the Frank Marino/Spinal Tap social suicide category.
And Jim Croce isn't Rock.
And ya gotta be a dink in the first place to give micro examples which are exceptions to the rule when it's obvious someone else is purposely making a broad generality in a large category. Ya think those above musicians didn't come to mind when I was making my original point? Of course they did, Einstein. Duh.
I stand by my original point of mustaches looking out of place on Rock Star's faces. All in all, NOT a good look. Oh, excuse me. Maybe I should make it more numerically accurate...
Okay, mustaches look like garbage on NINETY NINE POINT NINE PERCENT of Rock Star's faces. There. Ya feel placated now???
It's like one person saying "The Patriots defense is horrible." Then another person saying "Did you not see the strip sack the week before last?"
It's called "making generalities", you fricking ding bats.
Mustaches blow. There's yer generalit.y right there
On Tom Selleck? NO. On MOST males? YES... and ESPECIALLY those in the Rock music field.
Tell you what, run a small indie record label in a major city for 15 years, then you can talk to me. (or run a Progressive Rock magazine. Tunescribe is the only one I know of around here who's qualified to speak to me on this matter. Why did I talk sociology on a freaking football fan board anyway? I guess you could say it's the same concept as Grohl's fauxstache. lol.)
Lastly, back to what triggered this essay in the first place...
Glen Ordway looks like a total lunchpail-toting tard with that gross mustache. But hey, sportsradio is the perfect place for males like that. Maybe they could replace him with the mustached curmudgeon from Parks & Recreation. Same type of guy.
Good riddance.