BlueThunder
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2019 Weekly Picks Winner
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 5,601
- Reaction score
- 2,799
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This was tounge and cheek how can you disagree with this?
The only way Edelman can win the appeal is if he is traded to the Jets or adopted by the Manning’s before the hearing.
This might be one of those cases where it's better to take the punishment.
It's a heavy fine leaking this info but since it's a Pat no one will be held accountable.The fact that everyone already knows that he tested positive for an "unknown" substance AND that his appeal is today, is a violation of the CBA.
This is supposed to be a confidential process until it is completed. The league office has more leaks in it than Congress.
My gut tells me that Edelman gets screwed here.
I don’t believe the ruling is usually given on site, but with Goodell vs the Pats, all rules go out the window. He may have upheld the suspension before Jules even walked in the door.I know the appeal is today but does anyone know when the ruling is? Like, does he give the ruling right there with everyone in the same room like Judge Wapner? Or do we have to wait a couple weeks?
I know the appeal is today but does anyone know when the ruling is? Like, does he give the ruling right there with everyone in the same room like Judge Wapner? Or do we have to wait a couple weeks?
What?2. Does this "unknown substance" simply mean there was a spike in the chart that can't be attributed to any particular chemical they tested for, but that something was resident in Edelman's blood that isn't normal for humans to have?
Most likely, yes. A chromatogram such as below would have been generated. The people evaluating the data would try to identify what each peak corresponds to. Probably, a significant peak did not match any known substance.
3. And if so, could the unknown substance be something that's not illegal?
Yes, it could be. They also might suspect that it is a close family member of a known drug that is illegal, based upon where it appears in the spectrum above and based upon its molecular weight (the material is shunted to a mass spectrometer as each peak comes off the column.
4. And if so, wouldn't this circumstance already have been experienced and adjudicated by the NFL process, given that thousands of these tests have been done by now?
Yes, One would think that it would be extremely odd that Jules would have a substance in his blood or urine that had never shown up for any other player.
???What?
I was just kidding. Your answers were very thorough and interesting... just very complicated stuff.???
I was answering the questions by another poster. Is something unclear?
| 16 | 451 |
| 317 | 9K |
| 64 | 5K |
| 12 | 2K |
| 19 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 20 - May 5 (Through 26yrs)











