- Joined
- May 31, 2016
- Messages
- 16,552
- Reaction score
- 28,594
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You're forgetting that once April hits, Not everything is to be believed. Just because San Fran sent people there doesn't mean they did so because of interest. They could have done it to confirm their disinterest.I heard Kiper say this morning that he heard that Jones to San Fran was done...interesting because San Fran is going to be at Fields pro day today.
Or, if the Jets or even the Jags take their guy, to better make their decision. Whoever they have in mind might not be there at 3, no matter what the experts say.You're forgetting that once April hits, Not everything is to be believed. Just because San Fran sent people there doesn't mean they did so because of interest. They could have done it to confirm their disinterest.
I would go with Parsons over Smith and Waddle, but not over Chase. I generally agree with your premise but IMO Chase is a special player, I would take Chase and Pitts, but neither will make it past #6, beyond that I would take Parsons and Paye over the other receivers, and take a receiver later in the draft, especially if they can get their QB in the 2nd round..Here is the thing if it came to any WR vs Parsons. You go with Parsons EVERY time. You go with the player who can make and impact on EVERY defensive play. the problem with every WR no matter how great is that 99% can be defended and minimized, The pats have proven over the years that is a COMBINATION of decent receivers make an offense go. THe
Gotcha. Thanks manSo I don't "rank" prospects like most normal people. I put them through a scale which gives me a grade. A guy like Lance would never score that high bc he's only played a season. I've built-in risk mitigation to not get caught going crazy over guys with little experience, "one hit wonders" some might say.
Most get caught up in the hype, their rankings change every week or when the big shots chime in. I put them through a scale and let the grades speak for themselves.
Not worth grinding all that tape if you're not looking at neck sizes.
It's definitely an interesting correlation, but I'm more interested in who are the pencil necks that made a NFL team with a 14 inch neck...and are they currently paralyzed or worse.Jones, Mond or Mills will be excellent value in the later rounds based off these neckalytic projections.
It's definitely an interesting correlation, but I'm more interested in who are the pencil necks that made an NFL team with a 14 inch neck...and are they currently paralyzed or worse.
Shanahan starting already ??
@BaconGrundleCandy - what difference does that make for a QB? To me, if a right handed QB starts with his right leg back, he's subtly closing off his view of his blindside. With the Left Leg back, he's forced to view that blind side because of body position.
But I am curious as to what Shanahan's thinking is on it.
I haven't been following this thread at all, so this may already have been covered, but I saw this tidbit of information and thought I'd post if for y'all.
lol Captain...I love it that you do not hold back. I assume out of the top 5, you have Fields number 5 then?No they're not.
Fields doesn't even make his draft board..lol Captain...I love it that you do not hold back. I assume out of the top 5, you have Fields number 5 then?
I haven't been following this thread at all, so this may already have been covered, but I saw this tidbit of information and thought I'd post if for y'all.
@BaconGrundleCandy - what difference does that make for a QB? To me, if a right handed QB starts with his right leg back, he's subtly closing off his view of his blindside. With the Left Leg back, he's forced to view that blind side because of body position.
But I am curious as to what Shanahan's thinking is on it.
Better vision looking over the field - more efficient, esp for quick, in breaking stuff. A lot of it depends on what you're running but for a righty I think it's a lil more efficient.I suppose it factors into the timing of drops. Depending on which foot you start with, the amount of steps and depth you get in the pocket may change your timing for planting the backfoot and throwing, or for taking a hitch step, etc. I'm not sure what Shanahan prefers and why, but I'm curious if it would change depending on route combinations and where you're trying to attack on the field.