- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 21,618
- Reaction score
- 15,804
FYI the first (bad) play was Jackson, only the 2nd was Williams.
I stand corrected.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.FYI the first (bad) play was Jackson, only the 2nd was Williams.
Skipper needs to think about having a liter breakfast.
I'm starting an Inman gang . Meet up in this chat. passphrase is "Inman over Thomas".
Duke Dawson is having perhaps his best practice as a Patriot. He's had pass breakups in 1-on-1s and 11-on-11s. He went undefeated in 1-on-1s.
Yeesh. FYI That’s their CB1 & All Pro FS.
I disagree there are benefits to having a player on the pup but, assuming he's not rushing back, for the individual it's better to get in here and start getting work with TB and the system. Not to mention we might need Thomas in the first half of the year it's not like we are stacked at WR and TE.I would hope not in reference to Thomas's case. IF he's activated someone or two or maybe he himself will have to be cut or released.
I disagree there are benefits to having a player on the pup but, assuming he's not rushing back, for the individual it's better to get in here and start getting work with TB and the system. Not to mention we might need Thomas in the first half of the year it's not like we are stacked at WR and TE.
Thomas is an A type player if he gets back to form I'm not stashing him on the pup in hopes of holding one extra B, C level player. I want him back asap to find out if he can still be an A.
How is it a good signing if he never plays a game? That is getting zero out of the signing. That’s not good.Still, a good signing whether he makes the team or not.
I think we can sacrifice the 53rd pkayer in the roster for our WR2I would hope not in reference to Thomas's case. IF he's activated someone or two or maybe he himself will have to be cut or released.
Hopefully their some NFL scouts watching today's practice so we can get a draft choice for Deke instead of just waiving him.
so let's try this again Edelman Myers Gordon Harry Berrios
Thomas PUP
Meredith PUP
I don't get how Gordon will be one of the 5 WRs active starting the season with DThomas and Cam Meredith on PUP.
Goodell likely won't let him back in until October/November - - which is ironically fine with Pats as they succeeded in getting a roster exemption for him. That's a nice stash.
I can more easily see Edelman, Harry, Harris, Myers, Dorsett
with DThomas and another position player on PUP (can only have 2).
Gordon in Stash City (probably not a good use of words in this case......)
Dorsett was money in the bank for Brady the last two months of the season and playoffs. Other than Edelman, he is the only other active WR with whom Brady has big game experience. I can't see the Pats throwing Brady out there with Edelman and 4 newbies. He's going to need one more experienced partner. Dorsett brings burner speed and deep separation that the other 4 don't posses. Good diversification.
I don't get how Gordon will be one of the 5 WRs active starting the season with DThomas and Cam Meredith on PUP.
Goodell likely won't let him back in until October/November - - which is ironically fine with Pats as they succeeded in getting a roster exemption for him. That's a nice stash.
I can more easily see Edelman, Harry, Harris, Myers, Dorsett
with DThomas and another position player on PUP (can only have 2).
Gordon in Stash City (probably not a good use of words in this case......)
Dorsett was money in the bank for Brady the last two months of the season and playoffs. Other than Edelman, he is the only other active WR with whom Brady has big game experience. I can't see the Pats throwing Brady out there with Edelman and 4 newbies. He's going to need one more experienced partner. Dorsett bringsd burner speed and deep separation that the other 4 don't posses. Good diversification.
.