While one scout’s opinion is like a star amongst the galaxy, it’s always notable to hear various viewpoints during draft season. A recent comment raised a few eyebrows around the PFF offices, as one league source apparently referred to Texas running back D’Onta Foreman’s blocking skills as “awful.”
Rotoworld has that comment and other player notes on Foreman, but we checked in with our top running back analyst, Matt Claassen, to get his more level-headed view on the matter. Here’s what Claassen had to say about Foreman:
“Foreman did not give up a sack, and rarely allowed any pressure in 2016, but Texas does run an offense that limits how often running backs have to pick up defenders in pass protection. Foreman carried out a lot of play-action fakes and run-pass option plays, and stayed in on quick passes that led to him not having to engage with a defender on the vast majority of his snaps in pass protection.
When he did have the opportunity to pick up a defender one-on-one, he seemed to go low for a cut block more often than other backs, despite his bigger frame. I’m not sure whether that is due to coaching or preference, but he generally did well with those. When he took on defenders up high, there were times where he tried to just throw a shoulder into the pass-rusher and duck his head, instead of properly engaging and keeping the rusher in front of him. That will be an area where he will need to improve. Based on his tape, however, categorizing him as untested may be more accurate.
That said, there are not many colleges that utilize running backs in pass protection the same way the NFL does anymore, and even fewer that are actually successful at it. Pass protection is typically the biggest adjustment for running backs transitioning from college to the NFL, and Foreman, along with the majority of the backs in the draft class, won’t be an exception.”