No you can’t just wave a wand. Yes they could have freed up money by releasing players and that would make them worse. Do you think they just decided that year that they weren’t going to make any moves? They didn’t because they couldn’t. It was the position they were in because of how they managed 2014-2018.
You do not know Brady would have taken less and id he did how much less? Again they would have had to release players (and/or fire go the few signings they made) in order to keep him.
It’s not fair to criticize based upon “coulda” when you can’t show how.
My point is this:
They could not have kept Brady and at the same time made the other 52 better in 2020 than it was in 2019. I would gladly entertain an argument of how they could have, but all you have so far is they could have “made moves”. I think you have forgotten the shape the team and the cap were in.
Yes they could have paid him, I don’t disagree with that. But they could not pay him and also prevent the further degradation of the other 52.
Yes, they could have. Just not at the level they were able to last year. And Brady's salary wasn't the major problem, they had bigger issues causing them headaches. His was just a small piece of other personnel miscues.
And I'm not criticizing, it's just a fact that he would have stayed had they been willing to commit to him and make him feel like they wanted him. That part isn't my opinion, that's all documented. Again, am I mad? No, because things worked out. I've already said in the past I didn't agree with it, but I understand why they did it. But trying to continue the discussion about how they couldn't have kept him and made it work just isn't true. At the same time, it would have required a longer commitment to push his salary out so they could continue having money to work with. They didn't want to, and it was what it was.
Letting him walk at that point, combined with some other moves, set them up to be able to sign who they signed while only enduring one bad year. Obviously, not all those names would have been added had he stayed, so I get it.
But they've won titles with less and I feel like had Antonio Brown not been in trouble, they probably could have done more damage in 2019 and who knows what might have happened. You make it sound like that team was terrible, they weren't that bad (7th in points scored per game, #1 in yards allowed per game on defense). One key issue there was the fact Brady knew he was done, so that didn't exactly help the situation. That and the fact he didn't have anyone to throw to because they didn't have the one threat they needed to open guys up.
To your point "would have, could have" - but that team was one key offensive player and a QB who hadn't mentally moved on from being better than it was, and maybe even a contender. Obviously, we'll never know because that's not how it went down.