Bingo you put your own conditional into that sentence. If he is right. And that was exactly Hoyer's path to be a starter and reason for being signed. The steady, uninspiring and inconsistent QB who can run the offense the way McDaniels wants it to.
But you said:
Which somehow didn't include any conditional about Newton being fine but clearly said he is not here to be a QB. Which goes against everything that was reported and indicated to various beat guys from Hoyer himself and his agent. Moreover we have also seen all this play out exactly as reported with our own eyes in the first week of camp when Hoyer got the same amount of reps as Newton and Stidham. He got the same chance to contend for the spot as everyone else.
Again a far cry from "he is not here to play QB".
Obviously, if Cam is right and didn't lose his mental faculties he will most likely beat out both Stidham and Hoyer. But that is besides the point. It is not embarassing to say that Hoyer had a path to be the starter but simply a matter of fact.
I hold their experience and -- above all -- their access higher than anyone on this board. Hate the sports media aspect and all the flashy/click-baity headlines all you want but they are sitting closer to the source than probably all of us ever will.
And just because Howe reported on April 27th that nothing has changed between the Pats and Newton doesn't mean he was wrong then when two months later the same player signed for peanuts because his camp realized that there was not much else out there.
I don't really understand where you antagonism towards sports journalists is coming from -- and I say specifically journalists to not include your Felgers or Breers in that group.
Even a bozo like Volin has built up rapport with either league office folks or a bunch of agents as he is the one who almost always has contract breakdowns first. Coming from the draft world you should know as well as anyone how important "access" is and how hard you have to work to get there.
Anyway, whatever.. what we can definitely agree on is that Newton will start and Stidham will most probably end up being his backup once healthy. Whether they carry Hoyer for COVID reasons once Stidham is fully back will remain to be seen.
You're not making much sense.
Starting a game bc Cam & Stid are injured is not the same as being the starter. That's literally his only way to playing & literally exactly what I've been saying.
That's NOT what this muppet was saying or alluding to. He's clearly saying Hoyer might be the starter week 1 bc of a "better grasp". Yes that's
embarrassing. No coach is bringing in Cam. Sitting him while healthy for a week or two bc Brian F'n Hoyer has a "better grasp" then going back to Cam.
It doesn't work that. I don't need "sources" or "access" to know that.
Regarding the media, I have antagonism against them. I just see them for what they are. Useful, sometimes insightful, sometimes full of ****. I'm just not in awe of these guys.
Some are incredibly smart, hard working & creative but let's be honest none of the guys you mentioned are any that. They're good but you find multiple of each if you're being honest.
I speak
regularly to guys that write for BR, Roto, SB, USA today ... Draft, Fantasy, NFL ... Even a few guys that cover the Pats for smaller outlets. There's no dislike or hate or w/e.
Lastly regarding what/who told Hoyer and his team what is irrelevant. Seriously who else was knocking down his door? And what happened this week is exactly what was going to happen.
You honestly think Bill is showing his hand this early ... With this motley crew of Cam, Stid & Hoyer. No way.
Bill isn't handing Cam the starting job day 1 in practice after he's been here for an hour. Not how he operates.