luuked
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 20,259
- Reaction score
- 37,772
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Now add, “The Patriots need to figure out a way to get Brady and Gronk back on the roster.”....Yep
I hope they read the OL/OT part as well
What was that one about? Was it like your mistake? Hopefully, you can explain both. Or, at least own up to yours instead of blaming a 79 year old guy for something he said 22 years ago. Please enlighten us as to what you meant when you referred to Sony M. as"she."Oops, I must've made a mistake...like Parcells & Glenn...
The Easley pick was unacceptable having two bad knees coming out of college.
Now add, “The Patriots need to figure out a way to get Brady and Gronk back on the roster.”....
The difference was Easley being a 1st round pick and the injury caused Gronk to slip into the 2nd round. Easley shouldn't have been a first round pick and I don't care the Seahawks were interested in taking him.And Gronk's back wasn't supposed to allow him to even have a career coming out of college. There are lots of examples of BB the GM taking huge swings at high risk/high reward type picks...unfortunately most don't pan out then you'll have one out of ten that's a damn Hall of Famer (Gronk).
All that said I'm still a results on the field guy. He can miss every draft pick ever, but if the team is competitive every year...that's the mark of a good off-season that leads up to that year.
Easly was #29 which for all intents and purposes IS a 2d round pick.The difference was Easley being a 1st round pick and the injury caused Gronk to slip into the 2nd round. Easley shouldn't have been a first round pick and I don't care the Seahawks were interested in taking him.
Whatever helps you justify the pick.Easly was #29 which for all intents and purposes IS a 2d round pick.
It's not that difficult to connect the dots. Michel is pronounced "Michelle". Michel's toughness is being questioned/how fragile his is and that's why he's referred to as "she" and spelling his last name as "Michelle".What was that one about? Was it like your mistake? Hopefully, you can explain both. Or, at least own up to yours instead of blaming a 79 year old guy for something he said 22 years ago. Please enlighten us as to what you meant when you referred to Sony M. as"she."
Thanks, captain...oh, wait...It's not that difficult to connect the dots. Michel is pronounced "Michelle". Michel's toughness is being questioned/how fragile his is and that's why he's referred to as "she" and spelling his last name as "Michelle".
It was not a mistake.
The difference was Easley being a 1st round pick and the injury caused Gronk to slip into the 2nd round. Easley shouldn't have been a first round pick and I don't care the Seahawks were interested in taking him.
So, a "she" is necessarily fragile?It's not that difficult to connect the dots. Michel is pronounced "Michelle". Michel's toughness is being questioned/how fragile his is and that's why he's referred to as "she" and spelling his last name as "Michelle".
It was not a mistake.
Okay Billy's white knight.Of course you don't care that Seattle targeted him, because that doesn't fit your narrative/whine. Everyone here knows that you have a keener eye for talent than both Belichick and Schneider. You probably thought that the Bills were fools for drafting McGahee or the Cowboys for drafting Jaylon Smith. Sometimes gambles on top 10-15 talents work out, sometimes they don't.
You would totally kill it as a NFL GM if you could go back in time and re-draft all of the Pats picks after waiting two years to see how well all of the players make the transition from college to the NFL and which players suffer career altering injuries.
That technology is just around the corner, you just have to be patient. Until then, you'll have to settle for being a poor man's Capt. Stone on Patsfans.com.
Is this a rhetorical question?So, a "she" is necessarily fragile?
Not to me. How about you?Is this a rhetorical question?
Ugh, do you really think @captain stone made a goof calling him a "she"?Not to me. How about you?
Ok, so based upon what you wrote and what he wrote, is it safe to say that you both think that a lack of "toughness and durability" ( your words) is a feminine trait?Ugh, do you really think @captain stone made a goof calling him a "she"?
Why do you think he would say that?
A player that keeps getting injured and missing time is going to have their toughness/durability in question - hence the reference to "she".
He's physicality on the field has also been in question.
Harry should be in this category more than Michel.