PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

NFL to propose to improve a team's draft position if it hires a person of color as HC or GM

Next Opp: TBD
THE HUB FOR PATRIOTS FANS SINCE 2000

CURRENT POPULAR DISCUSSIONS:
Patriots @ Seahawks pre-game discussion
Posted By: BobDigital
September 07, 2026 at 5:35 pm
Total Replies: 184

# Of Users:57
40yrpatsfanTriumphHypedGumbyJoeSixPatZumaPatsfanin PhillyPatriot Missilejavajunkyp8rytspatfanken
Daquan Jones and Shaq Thompson visiting
Posted By: Joey007
September 07, 2026 at 5:34 pm
Total Replies: 46

# Of Users:24
captain stoneJoeSixPatPatriot MissileDaBruinzClonameryp8rytsborismanslash83PATSYLICIOUSmike_usagisanJoey007
TODAY'S MOST REACTED POSTS:
DoubleDeluxeSoundgarden playing Pats/Seachickens W1 halftime show
6 Reactions
09/06 at 2:12 pm

By: DoubleDeluxe

Sect140Patriots @ Seahawks pre-game discussion
6 Reactions
09/07 at 9:38 am

By: Sect140

TODAY'S TOP POSTERS:#
mayoclinicmayoclinic40 posts
manxman2601manxman260118 posts
One-If-By-SeaOne-If-By-Sea16 posts
Ring 6Ring 614 posts
UptownUptown14 posts
 

DO you like this idea

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 5.5%
  • No

    Votes: 146 89.6%
  • Maybe, not sure

    Votes: 8 4.9%

  • Total voters
    163
Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
Full disclosure: I haven't read the entirety of this Dumpster fire of a thread, but where did IC say the article was partisan?

Of course you didn't launch a "personal attack," but that doesn't mean that what you did was not an ad hominem.
The article being partisan was obvious, the partisan opinion he was using it to support was right in his post.
 
As they say when you can argue facts call the other guy names. It’s your specialty.
You're the one ignoring facts, so I guess the shoe fits.
 
Don't know if it's been mentioned yet (I skipped over the last couple of pages), but the 2-Minute Drill on Sirius/XM radio's NFL channel this morning announced that the Rooney Rule has been updated to demand that teams now include At Least Two non-whites during any HC searches - and at least one NW during any Coordinator search...

I like this idea better than the previous one we've been discussing...

should make the coordinator one 2 as well.
 
I believe in fairness, and in my opinion this will make the playing field a bit more level. I implied earlier in the thread that I took the poll literal. It asked if I like "this idea", which generally I do, but I think there is room for improvement. But I think it has people thinking about the possible these types of inequities and I am always in favor of seeing people think about addressing problems/perceived problems.
Which playing field? There's the coaching field and then there's the ones you coach field. While you're leveling one you're creating an advantage to that team and hurting a team that maybe doesn't need a coach.
 
should make the coordinator one 2 as well.
Might as well, I suppose, though this new Coordinator business might also dove-tail with the link that XLIX posted in the previous page...It also sounds like the league is going to be more demanding - Much more demanding - that all teams comply with this update than they might've done in the past, when in some cases the Rule seems to have been ignored completely...
 
Last edited:
Which playing field? There's the coaching field and then there's the ones you coach field. While you're leveling one you're creating an advantage to that team and hurting a team that maybe doesn't need a coach.

coaches should have term limits
 
You're the one ignoring facts, so I guess the shoe fits.
I am speaking only of facts. You are the one who faces a fact you don’t like, and can not refute so you attack the messenger. Low class, low intellect thing to do. If the shoe fits.
 
Last edited:
I believe in fairness, and in my opinion this will make the playing field a bit more level. I implied earlier in the thread that I took the poll literal. It asked if I like "this idea", which generally I do, but I think there is room for improvement. But I think it has people thinking about the possible these types of inequities and I am always in favor of seeing people think about addressing problems/perceived problems.

But if you believe in fairness, you shouldn't like a proposal that would have teams moved down a spot in the draft simply because someone else hired a coach and/or GM of the right skin color. Sure, we're only talking about one spot in the 3rd round, but again, I don't see the fairness in that.

I have no issue with the modified Rooney rule that was passed, but I can see a possible scenario where it would be overkill.

Obviously this example isn't likely, but let's say Andy Reid has some medical issues before the season begins and decides to step down. The Chiefs name Eric Bieniemy interim HC, who then leads KC to a 19-0 season, shattering records along the way. They now won't be able to name his as the new permanent HC until they interview one more minority candidate. Again, this isn't likely, but it would just be ridiculous they can't instantly offer him the job.
 
Last edited:
I love all the people worried about "fairness" ... in the NFL.

There's like 5 combined black coaches and GMs in a league where blacks make up 70% of the players.

That's a lot more egregious than moving up a spot or two in the 3rd round.
 
You sound awfully chipper today. You must've gotten one of those rare atta boys from the old man. I'm happy for you.
I just made an observation based on facts
But I feel chipper everyday. Not every second of everyday but in general I try live a grateful life.

Hope you have a fine evening
 
I love all the people worried about "fairness" ... in the NFL.

There's like 5 combined black coaches and GMs in a league where blacks make up 70% of the players.

That's a lot more egregious than moving up a spot or two in the 3rd round.
What specifically does % of players have to do with % of coaches?
 
Let’s get off this subject because it’s no longer an issue

Next question: what do you think of affirmative action and racial quotas?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

PatsFans.com LinkHub

𝕏 / Tweet
twitter.com
Uncategorized
twitter.com · by Uptown
1d
📰 Article
youtube.com
Uncategorized
youtube.com · by One-If-By-Sea
6d
📰 Article
youtube.com
Uncategorized
youtube.com · by Clonamery
7d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Schefter on Giants Offer For Cam Ward
twitter.com · by Uptown
14d
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @NFL on X: Drake Maye No. 11 on the NFL Top 100 of 2026
Patriots Videos
x.com · by Ian
17d
REISS: How will the Patriots respond in 2026 to the Super Bowl loss?
Interesting Article (Sports)
espn.com · by Ian
18d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: 2026 Patriots Day 1 Joint Practice - Patriots INTs
Patriots News
twitter.com · by Ian
18d
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @Brewers on X: 22 Runs During a Wild Night
Video
x.com · by Ian
19d
MORSE: Preview of The Seattle Seahawks Opening Night
Patriots News 09-06: Key Matchups Against The Seahawks
MORSE: Comparing the 2025 Roster to This Year’s Roster
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 9/3
MORSE: Patriots Busy Adding to 53-Man Roster and Practice Squad
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Press Conference 9/1
MORSE: Patriots Roster Remains in Flux
Breaking Down the Patriots’ 2026 Initial 53-Man Roster
MORSE: Some Hits and Misses on Patriots’ Initial 53-Man Roster
Patriots News And Notes 08-30: The Depth Will Be An Issue
Back
Top