SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.With banged up running backs, the Patriots needed Hill more than Bolden.
We needed a wr more than we needed Bolden.Ignoring that Hill has been very mediocre in his NFL career, Bolden seems to be more useful than the trash WR they picked up (Darboh, Hansen)
It's a lot more likely that a big ST play, which Bolden can provide, will contribute to a win more than waiver wire WR who likely won't even dress on game day
Ignoring that Hill has been very mediocre in his NFL career, Bolden seems to be more useful than the trash WR they picked up (Darboh, Hansen)
It's a lot more likely that a big ST play, which Bolden can provide, will contribute to a win more than waiver wire WR who likely won't even dress on game day
The waiver wire WRs were a desperation move to replenish a depleted WR corps.Ignoring that Hill has been very mediocre in his NFL career, Bolden seems to be more useful than the trash WR they picked up (Darboh, Hansen)
It's a lot more likely that a big ST play, which Bolden can provide, will contribute to a win more than waiver wire WR who likely won't even dress on game day
Bolden was beaten out for that special teams job. It happens.Ignoring that Hill has been very mediocre in his NFL career, Bolden seems to be more useful than the trash WR they picked up (Darboh, Hansen)
It's a lot more likely that a big ST play, which Bolden can provide, will contribute to a win more than waiver wire WR who likely won't even dress on game day
No he wont.Bolden is just collecting an updated version of the Dolphin playbook, he will be back.....
No the plan was to cut bolden.What exactly was the plan here? Were they trying to sneak somebody onto the PS by cutting them late?
Why did they do it last year?No the plan was to cut bolden.
There was no sneaking, they cut him and only kept 52. There was no reason to cut him if they wanted to keep him, they gained nothing by cutting him.
They didn’t cut to 52 last year. Cutting bolden allowed them to essentially keep 54. I forget who the 54th player turned out to be.Why did they do it last year?
Oh was he cut to get somebody to IR?They didn’t cut to 52 last year. Cutting bolden allowed them to essentially keep 54. I forget who the 54th player turned out to be.
There is no gain in cutting him when it drops you to 52. (And 51 with Izzo to Ir)
Hill has been very mediocre in his NFL career
This is very trueGreat now we're going to have to change up our special teams playbook
According to Armando Salguero, the Dolphins contacted Bolden as soon as he was cut.No the plan was to cut bolden.
There was no sneaking, they cut him and only kept 52. There was no reason to cut him if they wanted to keep him, they gained nothing by cutting him.
What exactly was the plan here? Were they trying to sneak somebody onto the PS by cutting them late?
Last year? As I said I don’t remember.Oh was he cut to get somebody to IR?