libra957
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,856
- Reaction score
- 1,905
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.They have white and lewis to catch out of the backfield.
I'm trying to get back into in-season mode. There's not really any point to breaking down X's and O's during the offseason unless the football talk really pulls me in. You'll see more X's and O's type posts as we get into the season. In the offseason, I'm more interested in making poop jokes. Thanks for the compliment, though, man. Looking forward to your film breakdowns too.
I have a different take.
I'm not so sure Atlantas scheme worked as I am that early in the game players made plays.
It's not like our offense was inept. We moved the ball fine but just had inevitable bad play to short circuit drives.
If Blount doesn't fumble, the OL holds up in 2 3rd down sacks, and Brady and reads the coverage right on the pick 6 and hit so a wide open Edelman coming out of the bunch instead of forcing in to an expected to be open amendola this is close game maybe even patriots are up at half time.
What changed was the the patriots eliminated bad drive killing plays and couldn't be stopped.
The Falcons didn't play BBDB at all.I think there is truth to that. I also think Atlanta played Patriots bend-but-dont-break D all game in hopes of creating plays like the trap on the pick 6 or pressures/sacks...forcing the Pats to execute perfectly on high play-count drives. In the second half, Atlanta still forced long drives in small chunks, but the Pats used guys like Amendola and Mitchell on outs and comebacks, away from the traps/robber in the middle, matched up against inferior CBs rather than focus on Edelman, making the effort easier and thus easier to make plays in general.
Regards,
Chris
But now that you've brought it up and I've looked, I'm not sure why they didn't pass to Blount more. Was it because it wasn't successful enough to force defensive personnel changes?
Then talk about the player, don't trash the SBYes, but I think it's fair game to call out a player if you think their performance last year will carry over into 2017. No team is perfect.
The Falcons didn't play BBDB at all.
No they didn't. They played almost exclusively man.They didn't play blatant prevent D, but they tended to keep everything in front of them. This is why I think the comeback routes in the 2nd half were so successful. They gave up nothing deep. They almost never blitzed. Looked very BBDB to me.
Regards,
Chris
James White
Career rushing TDs before Super Bowl: 2
Rushing TDs in Super Bowl: 2
He had 2 rushing TDs in his whole career. He had 2 in the postseason, all against Atlanta! Would have probably been MVP if it wasn't for Brady's numbers. Come on now.
James White. Atlanta's defense should be embarrassed.
I agree with you. I've read various arguments on here that I shouldn't trust my own lyin' eyes, but to me it looked like the O-line was doing poorly - as it did against Houston. That's two out of three playoff games where the Oline looked weak. It's also why I don't get the point of Cooks - I just don't think Brady has the time to throw long that much, and when he does have the time, we don't need anyone else.Still not over this. We gave up far too many sacks, and Brady got hit far too many times. Convince me my concerns are overblown.
I agree with you. I've read various arguments on here that I shouldn't trust my own lyin' eyes, but to me it looked like the O-line was doing poorly - as it did against Houston. That's two out of three playoff games where the Oline looked weak. It's also why I don't get the point of Cooks - I just don't think Brady has the time to throw long that much, and when he does have the time, we don't need anyone else.
That said, as a spectator without game experience or detailed expertise, I find the Oline vs Dline game the most difficult to understand. I just can't see who's making an error, what's happening, what kind of leverage is being done - I don't claim to understand at all what's really happening. But I saw Brady on the ground a lot, and hit a lot, it seemed.
Apart from strategic considerations, if we make the playoffs this season, Brady would presumably have 4 extra games under his belt by then compared to '16, and I'd be profoundly concerned about durability at that point if he keeps getting hit.
blount is slow, that's why.
gillislee is much faster and with him back it will keep defenses guessing.
I think you mean that blount wasn't quick or sudden (like Gillislee is), like you need to be as a receiver making cuts, etc.
Blount was fast enough if he could build up a head of steam (and was a terror to bring down in the secondary), but it took him a number of steps to build up speed (like many big backs).
Read and Learn more. Post less. My advice to you at this point. You are embarrassing yourself especially the comments about Cooks which are cringe worthy.I agree with you. I've read various arguments on here that I shouldn't trust my own lyin' eyes, but to me it looked like the O-line was doing poorly - as it did against Houston. That's two out of three playoff games where the Oline looked weak. It's also why I don't get the point of Cooks - I just don't think Brady has the time to throw long that much, and when he does have the time, we don't need anyone else.
That said, as a spectator without game experience or detailed expertise, I find the Oline vs Dline game the most difficult to understand. I just can't see who's making an error, what's happening, what kind of leverage is being done - I don't claim to understand at all what's really happening. But I saw Brady on the ground a lot, and hit a lot, it seemed.
Apart from strategic considerations, if we make the playoffs this season, Brady would presumably have 4 extra games under his belt by then compared to '16, and I'd be profoundly concerned about durability at that point if he keeps getting hit.
He had a Kony Ealy-like game (minus the forced fumble and pick)Grady Jarrett had 3 sacks in the whole regular season. He had 3 in the postseason, all against us! Would have probably been MVP had they won. Come on now.
Grady Jarrett