OT: Rex Ryan foot fetish? (merged many times)

[Joker]

if Rex has his way the NFL films will come to stand for...

New Foot Lover films

get your DVD today at Deviant Downloads...the home of hot feets...don't fail me now!

 

[Bella*chick]

Speak for yourself. I most certainly do not want to live in a society (whether called "utopia" or not) where this type of activity is accepted and tolerated as just another healthy lifestyle choice. And for the record, I'm referring exclusively to the "please gangbang my wife" aspect, not the foot thing.

Yeah, I'm definitely more with you here.

 

[Joker]

how many times have we told you, Beaver...touching toe is now way to go...now go to your room and eat your goddamned snack..

 

[NEGoldenAge]

1) We're not exactly talking about the privacy of a couple's bedroom in this case, are we?

2) I have no problem passing judgement on a disgusting, deviant and perverse activity such as a guy openly soliciting for a group of men to gang bang his wife (while, presumably, he participates too). And if you see my passing judgment as a worse act than a guy trying to have "all 3 holes" of his wife violated, then you've got some really backwards morals.

My morals are pretty simple. It usually comes down to whether an act hurts someone to determine if it is bad. Although I'm not a religious man there is a concept, reoccuring in many faiths and philosophies, that I hold very dear. Treat others the way you would like to be treated.

It is ok to find some behaiors gross or disgusting. To scorn someone because of that is somethinng else altogether. In this life, many people will give you real reasons to hate. Don't let the trivial stuff add to that.

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

1) We're not exactly talking about the privacy of a couple's bedroom in this case, are we?

2) I have no problem passing judgement on a disgusting, deviant and perverse activity such as a guy openly soliciting for a group of men to gang bang his wife (while, presumably, he participates too). And if you see my passing judgment as a worse act than a guy trying to have "all 3 holes" of his wife violated, then you've got some really backwards morals.

Agreed.

Yes, I think less of Ryan and would not think as well of BB were he to be such a salacious prevert (sic) & exhibitionist. Your mileage may vary.

Actions have consequences. Professionally and personally.

 

[Patsfanin Philly]

The problem here isn't with Rex. If you are not intimate with a person, why would their bedroom choices change the way you think about them? Most people are WAY too hung up on other peoples' sexuality and sexual values. That type of judgement is usually rooted in deep insecurities.

Marv Albert says ,"hi".
I agree with you on most of your posting but it is hard to avoid the imagery that will unfortunately persist .

 

[NEGoldenAge]

Oh, whatever. Rex even told his locker room he was embarrassed, Of course we'd all love to live in a utopia where none of this matters, but we don't. And I'm pretty sure you don't have the sage insider view into everyone's insecurities.

Btw, how do you know that Michelle Ryan's "deep rooted insecurities" haven't lead her to become a willing participant in this stuff?[

I do believe that genuine scorn towards someone for their bedroom activities is most often rooted in insecurities. I'm sure there are other causes, first among them is that it is taught.

I believe that "swinger" behavior is most often the result of a libido distilled through an individual's personality. There would certainly be cases where it is the result of insecurities, but I sincerely doubt that is the norm. In my case, it is the exact opposite. I believe that it is my own insecurities and hangups that make swinging unappealling to me.

 

[UofApatsfan]

 

[NEGoldenAge]

All I can say is that if you find people laughing about this offensive, you're the one surpressing your feelings. No one is wishing harm on them... it's called laughing at an embarassing situation. Those of you on your high and mighty rants should look in the mirror and ask yourselves why you care about someone laughing at this sitituation. These are adults who have put themselves out there and are not victims at all.

I'm drawn to this thread because I find humor in this. Why is there a need for some to defend the humor? Aren't there any other threads that you can spend your time preaching in? Why are you drawn to this?

I don't find people laughing about this offensive. Not even a little. Genuine scorn and thinking "less" about people is what I am responding to. I had a good laugh myself, but I think no less of Rex Ryan for it.

 

[primetime]

2) I have no problem passing judgement on a disgusting, deviant and perverse activity such as a guy openly soliciting for a group of men to gang bang his wife (while, presumably, he participates too). And if you see my passing judgment as a worse act than a guy trying to have "all 3 holes" of his wife violated, then you've got some really backwards morals.

How is this disgusting, deviant, or perverse, if the man participates as well and his wife, as his partner, consents as well? As long as it is not harmful towards anyone or the result of something any part of the endeavor does not consent to, no one should have the right to judge what adults do in the privacy of the bedroom.

The only part made public was the foot thing, the rest are all assumptions based on personal ad solicitation. And the foot fetish thing is just a fetish, only pornographic to those with foot fetishes (which, by sexual standards, is a pretty mild kink) themselves. For those who don't view the foot as a sexual object such as myself and clearly most other members of the board, it's just videos of some woman's foot. Which is gross and maybe a little 'weird' but certainly not immoral. Like NEGoldenAge, who has made himself the voice of reason, said, if anything it deserves maybe some jibes. Like the FootLicker thing, that's okay! But genuine scorn, that's too much.

As for FirstAndGoal, you made incredibly homophobic statements earlier in the thread and I can't believe you are continuing to post.

 

[Bella*chick]

I do believe that genuine scorn towards someone for their bedroom activities is most often rooted in insecurities. I'm sure there are other causes, first among them is that it is taught.

I believe that "swinger" behavior is most often the result of a libido distilled through an individual's personality. There would certainly be cases where it is the result of insecurities, but I sincerely doubt that is the norm. In my case, it is the exact opposite. I believe that it is my own insecurities and hangups that make swinging unappealling to me.

I believe the fact that I don't really want to sleep with anyone else beside my husband that makes me totally uninterested in swinging. I have no desire to go around banging people randomly and I would never have any desire whatsoever to be gang-banged. That doesn't make me "insecure" with hang ups at all.

You sound like your saying in order to be secure and without any sexual hangups, you should find swinging appealing! Give me a BREAK.

 

[JoeSixPat]

If "fantasy foot-ball" has a very different meaning in the Ryan household I'm fine with that...

But I have a tough time listening to the guy who posted these videos on FRIGGEN YOUTUBE tell me to respect his privacy.

 

[primetime]

So that's your tact now? Try and throw it on me. I never said anything bad about homosexual people. Pull it up. I referred to some people as possible closet homos. Sorry bud but that's hardly homophobic. Nice try though. Post where I made a homophobic statement moron. I never made a negative statement against anyone gay. Pull it up.

Because you aren't very smart, here's how it's defined.

Homophobia | Define Homophobia at Dictionary.com

You referred to Jets fans as 'closet homos.' Seemingly out of nowhere, since no one has referenced homosexuality in this thread.

For one, 'homo' is a distinctly pejorative term.

Second you're taking something you don't like (Jets fans) and equating them to something else ('closet homos'). It doesn't take a lot to make the connection that you don't like 'homos' much like you don't like Jets fans.

 

[NEGoldenAge]

I believe the fact that I don't really want to sleep with anyone else beside my husband that makes me totally uninterested in swinging. I have no desire to go around banging people randomly and I would never have any desire whatsoever to be gang-banged. That doesn't make me "insecure" with hang ups at all.

You sound like your saying in order to be secure and without any sexual hangups, you should find swinging appealing! Give me a BREAK.

I don't believe that makes you insecure at all. It was the "thinking less about people" that is usually rooted in insecurity There is nothing wrong with monogamy, and I never suggested that monogamy was rooted in insecurity. I have tremendous respect for people who remain true to their mates, esepcially in the face of ample opportunity. My caveat that is if you are in a monogomas relationship, cheating behind one's partners back is an aweful act.

You were the one who suggested that someone's insecurities would drive them to multiple partners. I was just using myself as a counter example. I think this misunderstanding clearly illustrates our differences in perspective.

 

[upstater1]

Speak for yourself. I most certainly do not want to live in a society (whether called "utopia" or not) where this type of activity is accepted and tolerated as just another healthy lifestyle choice. And for the record, I'm referring exclusively to the "please gangbang my wife" aspect, not the foot thing.

I think you pretty much do live in such a society. I don't think most people are really outraged by that. It's the ****stuff that the vast majority might have a problem with.

 

[upstater1]

There would certainly be cases where it is the result of insecurities, but I sincerely doubt that is the norm. In my case, it is the exact opposite.

I read this, then looked at your screen name, and almost got the wrong idea.

 

[NEGoldenAge]

I read this, then looked at your screen name, and almost got the wrong idea.

That went right over my head. I still don't get it.

 

[upstater1]

If you don't want people talking about your fetishes DON'T POST IT ON THE INTERNET!

You're going to have to explain to us how you can be an exhibitionist, voyeur, fetishist without posting on the internet.

There's a reason that the perv who reported this to Deadspin is now apparently a pariah in the fetish community.

 

[Pessimistic Pete]

Speak for yourself. I most certainly do not want to live in a society (whether called "utopia" or not) where this type of activity is accepted and tolerated as just another healthy lifestyle choice. And for the record, I'm referring exclusively to the "please gangbang my wife" aspect, not the foot thing.

Do you enjoy getting oral sex? To some people you are leading a disgusting lifestyle.

Let's make it simple, anyone who doesn't have sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation is a disgusting sexual deviant, alright? Or is it just things YOU find disgusting everyone else must feel the same way? Go back to FOX News.

 

[Bella*chick]

I don't believe that makes you insecure at all. It was the "thinking less about people" that is usually rooted in insecurity There is nothing wrong with monogamy, and I never suggested that monogamy was rooted in insecurity. I have tremendous respect for people who remain true to their mates, esepcially in the face of ample opportunity. My caveat that is if you are in a monogomas relationship, cheating behind one's partners back is an aweful act.

You were the one who suggested that someone's insecurities would drive them to multiple partners. I was just using myself as a counter example. I think this misunderstanding clearly illustrates our differences in perspective.

The bottom line is, I really don't want to know what Rex Ryan does behind closed doors but he and his wife put it out there for the world to see. If there was nothing to be embarrassed about well, he shouldn't have said he was. And he should stop referring to it as a private matter.

I don't think someone's insecurities might drive them to multiple partners. That's a hugely broad statement to make. Some people just don't believe in/can't do monogamy. But I do believe insecurities and a troubled background can lead one to a life in porn. That's why most porn stars are troubled people from troubled backgrounds. They are not what I would describe as "secure".

I guess it really depends what your definition of porn is.