- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Messages
- 19,929
- Reaction score
- 3
Ok, let's talk about this. I only have perspective on this as a dude, so that's all I can speak from. In general, a decent guy usually understands that unless it is blatantly obvious things like this are typically the fault of the guy. Most good guys don't like infidelity, haven't done it, and have never had the desire to be unfaithful. Most good guys take accountability for things; that's the way guys are wired. Some guys of lesser moral character publicly judge others for poor decisions. Just because it was a moronic decision on the part of dude who chased after the wrong girl under the wrong circumstances does not mean that there is not plenty of blame for all involved.
Look at it this way: assume that there is a woman executive working for a television company. There is a 24 year old male on-screen talent who is clearly attractive. His past history has made it abundantly clear that he has used his good looks and ability to seduce to further his career. The executive has a family, loves them, but makes a bad decision and allows herself to have a pair of strictly physical encounters with the guy. She gets a little too into the heat of it and texts him a topless picture. A little while later, she leaves the company and pursues another market. The on-screen talent feels a little burned, needs the publicity, and decides to approach a media outlet with the pictures and some dirty voicemails left after a few glasses of wine. Does the guy sound like a bit of a scumbag? Sure does to me.
The truth is that it's none of our goddamned business what happened and we don't know the whole story. To solely blame one person for something that is quite clearly on both parties is morally wrong. To claim to be a moral arbiter is wrong. It's one thing for this to be handled in private, another entirely to publicly humiliate people who did absolutely nothing wrong. Is Favre a moron and pretty clearly a dirtbag? Absolutely. Did this girl humiliate Brett's wife and kids by taking this public? Absolutely. In the grand scheme of things, I think that's everbit as bad as infidelity, that's all.
Every time I think we've turned the corner as a society, some young gun reminds me that some things will never change. You do realize what argument you just made, don't you? Look at how she was dressed, where she was, the situation she put herself into... What was he supposed to think, no meant no? They all say no when they usually still mean yes. This gal and the other two so far...didn't sleep with Brett. They said no for all the right reasons and he harassed them for it and in at least one case sent her pictures of what little she missed... I don't doubt he's scored plenty, and those gals may start coming out of the woodwork too. But this is all on him. No one is seducing the poor old gunslinger. He's not a private citizen, he's a multi-millionaire NFL QB selling wrangler jeans and he's hitting on multiple females in his employers employ and harassing them if they rebuff his advances.
As for his family, he's the one who humiliated them and they deserve to know what they're dealing with. As does the female general public. Altough I doubt Deana is stunned by the revelation. She knew what she bargained for - they were together off and on since college, where she got pregnant, when he wouldn't marry her and he didn't want her trailing him to GB to ruin his good old boy times and he didn't want to be a father to their first daughter. He didn't marry her until he was bottoming out on drugs and alcohol and he needed a lifeline because the league was getting ready to boot him. Why do you think she sends him back to the NFL year after year...by August he's miserable because the only thing he's ever really loved is being that gunslinging QB singing pants on the ground :singing:. He's spent his whole entire life doing whatever he damn pleases surrounded by a contingent of enablers. She's one of them. Just like Bus and Mooch and all the rest of his ardent admirers. I feel bad for his daughters, but that predates this.












